Hollowware Piece: Enhancing the Beauty of Your Dining


Showy dining table decorations have always been the mark of an aristocratic lifestyle. In this connection, the holloware comes into discussion. Both from the viewpoint of effectiveness and gorgeous lifestyle these cutlery stand on top of everything.


As opposed to flatware, hollowware or holloware portrays different kinds of tableware that encompasses candlesticks and candelabra to teapots, cream jugs, teapot, sugar bowls, kettles, coffee pots, serving dishes, napkin rings, creamer, pitcher etc. One general rule is that it has to be made of metal. Any metal made tableware that holds something rather than being flat like knives or plates. According to the Seasonal review about modern flatware it is really hard find modern hollowware which goes with them.

The Whens and Wheres

A few general traditions that are followed worldwide can be mentioned – these are mere guidelines though.

  • Gold/Silver cake knives & servers

Be sure to keep these in your wedding rental package to make the most memorable event of life take up a notch in those photos.

  • Gold/Silver Nut Dishes

Suitable for bar areas.

  • Gold/Silver Champagne Coolers

These ornate metal coolers will keep your champagne chill with style.

  • Silver Toasting Goblets

For a long-lasting impression of your toast in important events

  • Round & Full Silver Chafing Dishes

The name says it all. These excel in both function and panache looks.

  • Silver Coffee Urn

Alongside keeping your coffee piping hot these urns are opulent.

Hollowware Types

Here’s some different types of holloware piece you can use to enhance the beauty of your dining.

Tea Pots

Teapots are often teamed with sugar bowl, creamer, coffee pot, creamer and serving tray. The pieces in this set are coupled through the same design pattern. These days, it’s pretty common to mix up different designed pieces.


A kettle’s primary function is to hold warm water. The kettle usually comes in with the Tea Pot set.

Gravy Boat

Serves up gravies and sauce. Optional non-detached underplate.

Loving Cup

A pour-able drinking holding jar. Has two handles on both sides. These days the pieces are used as trophies and collectibles.


Candelabras can hold multiple candles at once in its sockets. This is a must for any event.

Water Goblets

Chalices that are greater than wine goblets. These are placed on the right side of the dinner plate.

Wine Goblets

Goes as a pair with wine goblet, placed at the upper right of the dinner plate, closer to to the guest. It is used to serve white, red and spritzer wine.

Coffee Pot

Usually comes in 5 piece set that contains footed cups and saucer sets. These are used for serving both tea and coffee. The saucer and the cups are designed to fit with each other perfectly. The pedestal goes into the little shallow hole in the saucer.

Sugar Bowl 

These holds both the granulated sugar and sugar cubes.


They are as big as sugar bowl in size, and as the name suggests you serve cream.


Hollowware is tableware you can use to decorate your dinner parties or launches. They can light up your dining if can properly set them up.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Plantation Shutter

You can surely go for the plantation shutters of you are looking for the perfect window treatment. They look elegant and match your room. Let us go through some pros and cons of having plantation shutters at your home and whether they suit your windows or not:


  • Higher Quality: Plantation shutter is customized which is of very higher quality, so it is impossible that you just get a standard set of plantation shutter at your home improvement store, as it is of no use.
  • Durable: They are created by using 100% pure quality solid wood. It is dependent on how you use and maintain it; they can last for a longer duration of time. It is durable as it is made up of the higher quality fabric, as well as the use of it, is also one of the reasons of it who is using it. Some people may use it roughly without cleaning them on regular basis and some people use it very delicately, and it is confirmed that their plantation shutter is going to last long as compared to people who use it roughly.
  • Customizability: Plantation shutters are normally customized which fit your window. The custom roman shades are available in terms of colors, paints, and stains. Even louvers can be set from 1 to 4.5 inches far. T is very easy to be built that you can make it on your own.
  • Aesthetics: Plantation shutters are the popular among customers due to its features like they are classic, elegant and have the best sense of architecture as per your home, which makes it the best choice.
  • Home value increases: plantation shutters are the only thing which can be considered in your home value. They help to increase the resale value of your home. The resale value of your home increases considerably.
  • Light Control: The amount of light which is entering the room is controlled by the louvers of plantation shutters.


  • Maintenance: Plantation shutters require having a regular maintenance if you wish them to last for a longer duration. You need to keep on tightening the louvers occasionally and clean them on a regular basis.
  • Views: You should not go for plantation shutters if you are willing to use panoramic views during a daytime and want to use window treatments during evenings. As it is only possible to open and close the louvers as shutters stay stable. You can use louvers which are situated further, say as 2.5 inches far if you want to have more light.
  • Cost: Normally plantation shutters cost more as they are usually customized and are of higher quality. You must think t have plantation shutter or not if you have a smaller budget.

Once plantation shutters are used the result is always time-honored and beautiful. It is your personal decision to choose the accurate window treatment for your home.  You can easily refer to various websites for the same.…

How To Plan Your Outdoor Adventure With Backpack


Ever wondered about going on a solo outdoor adventure or with a group? I believe you must have thought about it. But something is holding you behind right?

I know what that is, you don’t have a plan for it. Don’t worry I’m going to tell you today about to how to have a safe, secure and adventurous backpacking trips.

The first that you would want to do is determine the goals of the trip whether it is a solo trip or with someone. This helps to keep on your track so that you don’t miss anything. When in a group it makes sure that everybody is on the same page.

If you are planning your first adventure trip then it is better to do it in a group or with someone who is experienced in trips like these. Always try to choose an easy trip for your first adventure. It will help you build your confidence.


Trip planning should always start with Research


Doing research will help you gather information about all the great locations available where you can head for an adventurous trip. You can do this by searching online and there are various backpacking books available in the market to help the beginners. Make sure to check everything about the area you are going to visit as some areas have different restrictions. So it is better to check everything before.


Plan the route of the trip by learning the map of the area. These days GPS is there to help you but if you want a complete raw feeling then opt for a two-dimensional map or a topographical map.


Beginner backpackers should plan to cover shorter miles in the initial days as it will help them to gain more experience and will boost their confidence to cover more ground in the later days. It will also plan your daily mileage accordingly. Exploring new terrains while hiking less can be very rewarding, this way you can enjoy without getting too much tired. Make sure to choose daily mileage target whether traveling alone or in a group.

Carry Light pack

When carrying a light pack you will probably less rest breaks and you will cover more. There is no wrong way to bagpack so choose whatever style suits you the best.


Play your route in advance and decide where you would like to camp each night according to everyone’s flexibility. Sometimes this doesn’t go according to plan but it can be fun camping at a place which you like the most. You can also setup a base camp and do short trips to the areas nearby. This method is also good but it is up to you which method will make you more comfortable.


Sources of Water

It is very important to mark in advance the areas where you can find a source of clean water. If you are traveling in water scarce area it is better to keep more liters of water in your bag so that you don’t get thirsty.


Make sure you all the required gear in advance. Always test your gear before leaving for your trip. This is the best measure as you don’t want anything to go wrong with your gear in between the trip. If you have some hiker friends then try to borough their gear for your first trip. After the trip you will have an idea what gear is more important for you and you will avoid spending more money on the unnecessary gear. If you are planning to carry a gun with yourself then make sure to use it responsibly by keeping it safely inside a best gun safe under 500  . You can read more about guns here.

Prepare a list

Always prepare a list in which you mark the items that are essential for the trip. This will help you pack the bag in a more efficient way.

So here are all the things that you need to check before backpacking on a trip. Best of Luck!…

Running For A Political Office

If you feel motivated to make a difference because you do not like the way things are being done, whether it be locally or nationally, then running for political office might be for you.


Political issues are ultimately up to the political leaders that we elect, and they usually have the final say. Your stance on various political issues might differ entirely from your local mayor, city counsel, or even governor.


These political officials were elected, and gained popularity by putting in the time and effort to gain awareness for there cause. The way some political issues are dealt with is up to the elected official.

Can you see yourself making the tough decisions that shape our community? Dealing with the various political issues can be hard and strenuous work and takes a strong individual. Citizens with strong political stances will not hesitate to let you know if you are not doing a good job.

  • Running for political office is a test of inner strength and can often break some people. Starting with your community and people you know is often the smartest way to get into politics. It takes years of hard work to make a difference. Volunteering at public places such as schools and libraries is a great way to get your name heard if you plan on make changes to various political issues.
  • Knowing your neighbors in your town will go a long way to helping you gain popularity. These are the people that will ultimately get you elected.
  • Knowing the political process is a huge part of running for any political office. Being popular is great, but will only get you so far.
  • Having a strong stance on political issues is a must. You need to have something that you believe in, and if you want to get into politics, chances are that you do.
  • Spreading what you believe in as far as political issues is concerned is key. You need to speak with many people and discuss the various political matters that are going on in your town or state.
  • Political issues are the main entity of running for office. This is your backbone and what many voters will refer to when asking questions, if you believe in something, make sure you don’t change your mind. People will notice if you go back and forth on different topics.
  • The political process is long and arduous. You need to have the stomach to deal with hundreds of people, raise money for your campaign and debate with other candidates.


Knowing where you stand on your towns political issues is something you should know even before you decide to run for political office. Do enough hard work and you will be rewarded with political office position.

Many of our well known leaders started at the bottom and worked their way up, which is the beauty of our political system we have today. The political issues of your town, state, or country is the key to success to becoming an elected official.…

Global Warming Controversy

Global warming over the last decade has become a raging topic, not just in the United States, but among the political groups around the world as well.

Just to give you a refresher, global warming is the rise of average temperature of earths oceans and the surface air.

The continued increase of global temperature has been causing the ice caps to melt thus raising the sea levels. The increase of extreme weather and species extinctions are also affected by global warming.

The political views on this issue have been a controversial topic for quite some time now. Noted Democrat, Al Gore has been actively trying to spread awareness.

Many political groups around the world have expressed interest and concern for global warming for quite some time now.


Ever since the Republican Bush administration started however, it seems like global warming has been dismissed as a threat among the Republican party. The Greens/Green Party USA is a political group that has been trying to spread awareness for global warming since it’s inception in 1984.

The political group has actively been trying to combat the political views of the Republican party since President Bush was elected in 2000.

When President Bush took over, key portions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports were removed even though they cited many important points such as increased disease, post traumatic stress, increased violent weather and depression.

Even though these issues have been come to light, it seems as though the political views of the Bush administration have put added pressure on scientists doing the research. Political groups such as the green party, have reported numerous times that U.S. officials edit scientific reports from U.S. government scientists.

This is not the first time that political views have censored many important issues, but that fact that the U.S. government does this with global warming because the administration is skeptical is outrageous.


Political groups should not have to fight for something has threatening as global warming to be made aware, but unfortunately that is the case. The political views of the Bush administration have turned their back to something that is affecting world.

It has been documented that there is a concerted effort to convince Americans that global warming is natural and needs more research to be properly acted on.

Slowly but surely, we are coming around to idea that global warming is indeed a serious matter and that political groups have been speaking the truth.

In California, the California Global Warming Solutions Act was passed in August, 2006 to limit the states global emissions. World politics has always come into play, as Prime Minister Tony Blair has expressed interest to work with Gov.

Schwarzenegger independently of the federal government. As much as the political groups try to gain awareness, the political views of the government will always be an overriding factor. As a society we have to do what’s best for the world and try to our part.


When Wingnuts feed – Berg/COLB update

Martin attacks Berg, logic fails, political gadfly Alan Keyes joins the lawsuit choir, and the Hawaiian Court System hands Martin his butt. What we’re seeing is desperation, as the people that belived that either McCain would win or God would keep Obama out of the White House are both in full panic mode.

And I want to address those who say “just show the birth certificate already”. The problem with this is two-fold:

1) Most of the people demanding the birth certificate won’t believe ANY copy is legit. Ever.

2) If by some miracle they did accept it and admit he was born in Hawaii, then they would just go to “well, he lost his citizenship in Indonesia / he’s a dual-citizen of Kenya/UK/somewhere and the US, so he can’t be president”.

The problem with this request is everytime it’s been done, people always come up with Yet Another Excuse to reject it.

“I want proof you were born in the United States!”

“Okay, here’s a copy of my Certificate of Live Birth (which is accepted by the US state department to establish citizenship).”

“I don’t believe that’s valid. Prove your citizenship”

“Okay, here’s the results of a group examining the physical document”

“I don’t believe they’re honest. Prove your citizenship”

“Okay, here’s the state that I was born in confirming they hold a valid birth certificate in my name.”

“I don’t believe them. Prove your citizenship”.

And so on, and so on, and so on…..

And even IF the birth certificate WAS proven:

“Okay, you were born in the United States. However, you lost your citizenship as a child. Prove your citizenship”

“Um, the Nationality Act of 1940 and 1952 doesn’t allow for minors to lose their citizenship as a result of their parents activities, nor does it mean a person loses their citizenship if they marry a national of another country. By US law I’m a citizen”.

“I don’t believe you. Prove your citizenship”.

Be honest with yourselves. You’re not interested in seeing the real birth certificate, the constitution, US and State law, or anything else. You want something – anything – to prevent President-elect Obama from assuming office, and country be damned. Your fake patriotism doesn’t hide your true feelings – especially not from people who actually DO care about this country and the constitution, and hate seeing both used to cloak paranoid conspiracy theories.

12 November – “Gina Cobb” posts a guest post by “Dr. Robert Coambs” that is almost Time-Cube like in it’s sheer weirdness value. Called “Obama is Disqualified by the Known Unknowns”, it’s an attempt to use a form of logic to prove that, since President-elect Obama has not proven his citizenship to the satisfaction of those questioning it, (note – they never will be satisfied), then no matter what happens, he will not be president.

“(5) From this we can construct the following syllogism:Major Premise: To be POTUS, the candidate’s eligibility must be publicly known.
Minor Premise: Obama’s eligibility is not publicly known.
Conclusion: Therefore Obama is not POTUS.”

Okay, how about this then?

Major Premise: To be POTUS, the candidate’s eligibility must be publicly known.
Minor Premise: Obama’s eligibility has been verified by the State of Hawaii on multiple occasions, and therefore is publically known
Conclusion: Therefore Obama eligible to be POTUS.

If the premise of your argument is flawed, then the conclusion will be flawed. Example:

Major Premise: I wish to keep elephants out of my bathroom.
Minor Premise: Wrapping mirrors with tinfoil repells elephants.
Conclusion: There are no elephants in my bathroom because I wrapped the mirror with tinfoil.

See, the premise was flawed, therefore the conclusion is meaningless.

“Dr. Coambs” goes on to say:

“If Obama took office without his eligibility being publicly known, then he is not POTUS. If Obama pretended to be POTUS, and other humans believed that he was POTUS, he would still not be POTUS. Even if 300 million Americans agreed to let Obama sit as if he were POTUS, and run the executive branch of the USA as if he were POTUS, he would not be POTUS.The syllogism is compelling, omnipresent, and transcendent in time. So long as the premises remain true, the conclusion is true, and it’s form and meaning cannot be changed by human intervention.

If Obama sat as President, and left office 8 years later, he never was POTUS. If historians look back from 1,000 years hence, logic will dictate that he was not POTUS. For those 8 years, the USA did not have a POTUS. No element or feature of the past can be changed to make him POTUS. It is not possible to change the past. Obama never was POTUS.

None of the laws passed in the 8 years that Obama sat in the White House would be valid, because they must be signed into law by POTUS, and there would be no POTUS. Executive orders, Supreme court appointments, and declarations of war would not be valid. Nothing.

If the military took any action under the command of Obama, they would be in double jeopardy. Because they have sworn to uphold the Constitution, it would be forbidden by law for them to obey Obama, since according to the Constitution, he is not POTUS. POTUS is their commander in chief, not Obama. If they obeyed Obama on any matter, they might be held accountable for war crimes, since they acted without authority from POTUS. Because of the way military law works, there is no middle ground. The military can only obey the POTUS and uphold the Constitution, from the highest general to the greenest private.

There are two implications of this reasoning which are debatable, and go beyond the strict implications of the syllogism. They are (a) Because the military is charged to uphold the Constitution, by force if necessary, they may or may not be empowered (or required) to remove Obama from office, and (b) It may be correct and patriotic to refuse to follow any orders given by Obama. This may apply to all American citizens.”

12 November – “Patriot Brigade Talk Radio Network” announces a new player in this increasingly warped reality, Todd Nalagan, an attorney in Norman, Oklahoma.

“The Patriot Brigade Talk Radio Network has teamed with new legal counsel, in Texas, and Oklahoma, to force Barack H. Obama ( President-Elect ) of the United States of America to produce a Certified Birth Certificate from the state of Hawaii ( or other state ) in compliance with the United States Constitution.A public trust fund is currently being established which will be represented by the legal office of Todd Nalagan: Norman, OK, in which all funds donated, and given, as financial support will be used to ensure the success of legal counsel. This trust is public, which means that anyone wanting to know how the money is being used, and to whom it is being paid and for what reason(s) is public information.

Currently, a phone number is being set up as a support line for any inquires being made to Mr. Nalagan’s office. We’ll post that number in the next day or so. More information is being readied as we have just started this process. Please check back soon as information will be updated as needed. Note that a special page here on the Patriot Brigade Talk Radio Network and on Lan Lamphere’s website will be created with all the details once we have them established and are able to make them public.”

As for the comments:

“Empowered Patriot | Nov 12, 2008 |
Let’s set aside some money to ship Obama and his friends and family to Iran. Obviously, they want him there and since we don’t want him here it will be a good cause for everyone. If need be I would start a 501(c)(3) for the sole purpose of improving life in American by eliminating the scum bag. Now that would be a good cause.”

13 November – Among the comments at “TexasDarlin”, hope springs eternal….

“Dean M on November 12, 2008 at 10:07 pm.
I still believe it isn’t over until it is over. Obama isn’t President-Elect until the Electorial College meets and they cast their votes. Either the Bible Code is wrong or the popular vote with the assistance of ACORN is wrong. In either case, the Bible Code strongly indicates that Hillary will be our 44th US President. Right now I’m banking on whatever intelligence (the Almighty) encrypted this in the Torah.”

13 November – And anti-semite Andy Martin claims he’s filed a complaint with Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board against Philip Berg.

“Berg is playing on the vulnerability of people who intensely dislike President-elect Barack Obama, and using his inflated accusations to solicit money from the public. He constantly exaggerates or misrepresents the facts. In early September persons acting on his behalf claimed there was a “court order” for Obama to produce a birth certificate. No such order existed.Then he claimed Obama was in “default” and had “admitted” he was born in Kenya. This was compete nonsense. As someone who is a genuine critic of Mr. Obama, I know firsthand what confusion Berg creates with his false and misleading claims. Most recently he or persons acting in concert with him have suggested that the U.S. Supreme Court “ordered” a response to his nonsense. The Court has done nothing of the sort. The court’s rules simply provide a thirty-day period for responses.

I don’t know whether Berg suffers from an emotional disturbance, or is merely a money-grubbing huckster, or what, but Berg’s behavior is undermining public faith in the integrity of the Pennsylvania legal profession.”

And, proving that a broken watch actually CAN be correct twice a day, Andy Martin ends with:

“He is a threat to vulnerable citizens who tend to believe his false claims and give him money on the false assumption that Berg is acting in good faith. By stealing small amounts of money from people across the nation he has flown under the radar of professional discipline. No competent attorney could have acted as Berg did during the past three months. His behavior in federal court, all of which is a public record, is outrageous.”

Amazing. I actually agree with Andy Martin. For far different reasons, of course……..

13 November – “WorldNetDaily” complains that someone on the Obama campaign staff called the lawsuits what they were – garbage.

An Obama campaign spokeswoman told WND the complaints are unfounded.“All I can tell you is that it is just pure garbage,” she said. “There have been several lawsuits, but they have been dismissed.”

13 November – “Citizen Wells” posts about another lawsuit, this one filed in North Carolina by a “Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan, USAFR(R)”.

Much of it is word-for-word identical to Berg’s suit, even the “Canadian Birth Certificate” and “three forensic experts” claims. And the exact same misquote of the Nationality Act of 1940 that Berg uses. The main difference is that it’s against the North Carolina Secretary of State, and it’s being tried as a class action:

“3.1. I bring this action now maintained by the named plaintiff as a class action on behalf of myself and all persons similarly situated, comprising the class.
3.2. I am informed and believe that there are approximately over 4,000,000 members of the class so that joinder of all members is impracticable.”

So who is Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan, A retired USAF Reservist, he was part of a case in 17 May 2005 trying to get a restraining order prohibiting the North Carolina National Guard from deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan. That was denied. He got in the papers on 15 May 2008 because he believes he has the right to drive on public highways without a license plate, registration, or insurance.

“Sullivan said, “I can govern myself. And America is about self-government.”“If a person proves he’s responsible, leave him alone, he can govern himself, he doesn’t need to be bothered by the government,” said Sullivan.

Donald Sullivan isn’t your typical guy. The retired Air Force Lt. Colonel voted for Ron Paul in the recent election, and says our government has gotten too far away from the republic our forefathers founded.”

13 November – Philip Berg posts a video on his website “addressing a rally at the US Supreme Court” on 30 October.

The video is 31:45 in length, and is mostly a rather dull recap of his lawsuits. It’s interesting to note that there doesn’t seem to be many people at the rally. At 4:09 you hear *one* person clap, and at 4:29 the camera pulls away to show Berg and a ponytailed woman. And nobody else, (excepting the cameraperson I suppose)

At 5:15 he also mentions the Senate issue. This was a few days before he filed his fraud claim.

Around 12:20 you get someone laughing at Berg.

Around 14:40 you get someone off camera asking about Obama’s paternal grandmother. It kinda sounds like Will Bower……

Around 15:45 he mocks Obama’s maternal grandmother for not making a statement. Note, she passed away days after this “rally”.

Around 15:50 he gets a question from what sounds like the ponytailed woman.

Around 17:06 and 17:25 he answers questions from people off camera. Both sound like the same person.

Around 18:45, male question.

Around 21:10, the Will Bower sound alike again.

Two female voices heard around 23:40

Around 25:30, the Will Bower sound alike again

25:50, repeats his “all I want is the birth certificate” lie.

26:20, unknown male voice

28;20, unknown voice

29:10, Will Bower sound alike again

29:40, unknown male voice

30:10, unknown male voice

30:45, unknown male voice

31:14, Will Bower sound alike again

At no time do they ever show the crowd in this so-called “rally”. Assuming each question was a seperate person, (which I doubt, the voices sounded the same), that makes around 20 or so.

14 November – American Independent Party Presidential hopeful Alan Keyes, along with Wiley S. Drake and Chairman Markham Robinson, files suit in California Superior Court to prevent ” Secretary of State Debra Bowen from certifying to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger the names of Electors, and from transmitting to each presidential Elector a Certificate of Election, until documentary proof is produced and verified showing that Senator Obama is a “natural born” citizen of the United States, and does not hold citizenship of Indonesia, Kenya or Great Britain. “

Robinson, of course, was the player in Robinson v. Bowen, RNC, McCain,. et al, trying to get Sen. McCain off the ballot earlier. And Obama defeated Keyes in the race that sent Obama to the US Senate. So I dare say it’s personal for Keyes.

14 November – “Lan Lamphere” posts about the supposed Virginia case. Still no evidence it actually happened.

14 November – Parroting Berg’s line about “Constitutional Crisis”, WorldNetDaily posts an article about the Keyes lawsuit

14 November – “Faith2Action” puts out a press release about a planned ad in the Washington Times.

“The ad asks these three questions: (1) “Was Barack Obama born in Kenya?”; (2) “Is he really a citizen of Indonesia?”; and (3) “Does the Constitution still matter?” These questions point to various cases that have been filed before the U.S. Supreme Court and other Federal courts. The ad also lays out several alarming facts which question whether the Constitutional requirements for becoming President are satisfied by Senator Barack Obama.“Attorney Philip Berg, multiple legal cases, and a growing number of American citizens are demanding answers to these critical questions,” states Janet (Folger) Porter, the founder and president of Faith2Action. “The Constitution and our nation’s future are too important to not fully investigate this.”

“It’s our hope that the American people will rise up and call for Congressional hearings and immediate court action to avoid a Constitutional crisis,” added Porter. “If we are willing to ignore the Constitutional requirements for the highest office of the land, what else are we willing to forgo? That part about free speech? Freedom of the press? Freedom of religion?”

A PDF of the planned ad can be found here. The interesting thing to note is that “Faith2Action” does not seem to appear on it, rather the address is Philip Berg’s lawfirm. Adding to that is on 17 November, Berg’s website takes responsibility for the ad – with no mention of Faith2Action…..

14 November – and “TexasDarlin” comments on the Keyes case, saying the case is “It’s well-written and concise”. Since it’s just a replay of the highlights from the Berg case, both of those are debatable.

15 November – “America’s First” posts about the Keyes case. His opinion??

“In my opinion, however, Alan Keyes will likely not be found to have standing to sue Secretary of State Debra Bowen, President-elect Barack Obama, and others in the Superior Court of California, and for that reason his legal action will most likely go the way of many of the other, similar cases filed across the country — dismissal.The question is whether California Superior Court adheres to standing requirements more broad than the standing rules employed by the federal courts and enforced by the U.S. Constitution’s Case and Controversy Clause. Under those rules, a similar eligibility-related suit filed by American Independent Party of California Chairman Markham Robinson–who also appears as a petition in yesterday’s action–against Bowen and Sen. John McCain failed back in August.”

15 November – And “Jbjd” has a new idea – have someone in the military challenge the “standing” issue:

“Issue: Given that the President functions as Commander in Chief (“CIC”) of the armed services under the U.S. Constitution; that the CIC is authorized to order members of the armed services, including the national guard, into combat duty; that while serving combat duty such combatants may logically be required to inflict casualties on the enemy; and that causing the death of another under the color of law but not the rule of law could subject that combatant to criminal charges of murder and, on conviction, to execution for his crime; does a member of the military or national guard, currently deployed in or scheduled for deployment to a combat situation, have the particularized standing required by the federal court so as to create a case or controversy under Article III of the U.S. Constitution to successfully petition the federal court to examine whether Barack Obama is a natural born citizen and rule on his eligibility to be POTUS?Answer: Yes.”

I will note there is an increasing number of Cult of the COLB people who are trying to convince people that somehow President-elect Obama will be an invalid President and therefore no courtesy or respect (or obligation to follow any laws or mandates set during his administration) is needed. What they’re doing is trying to justify or excuse their behaviour. Since there is no level of evidence they will accept to prove in their minds that Obama is indeed a natural-born citizen, this means they can excuse their behavour on the grounds that “he’s not *really* president.

16 November – And “Dr. Kate” posts one of her rambling, borderline insane articles on “TexasDarlin”, cross posted from the formerly sane “No Quarter”. It pretty much boils down to the same claim “Judah Benjamin” made and that Donofrio is using in his lawsuit – there’s multiple tiers of citizenship by birth, and supposed or suspected dual-citizenship at birth renders means one cannot be president:

“Although doubtful, it is also possible Obama would try to argue that the 14th Amendment says that “naturalized citizens” and “dual citizens” are “American citizens”, thereby satisfying the requirements of Article II. I really can’t imagine he would bring this up, unless asked in a hearing, as the question of the 14th Amendment’s modification of Article II is a constitutional matter that only the Supreme Court can decide. Recall that on Obama’s own website he claims that he is a U.S. Citizen under the 14th amendment.”

Comments show a common thread about the Donofrio case – that due to it being seen by Justice Thomas, it’s a “slam dunk”. This is based, I guess, on the idea that Thomas, being a conservative, will automatically rule against President-elect Obama – and that the majority of the court would back him.

“The South on November 17, 2008 at 12:04 am
It doesn’t matter if Obama has a legit birth cert. now or not. This newest case is “BRILLIANT”
Obama could have been born in the White House with a BC to prove it and he still would NOT be eligible

Read it and enjoy … http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen

This case is on the Supreme Court docket right now, and guess who’s seeing the case ? Yep none other that Justice C.Thomas

This is the only case out there that don’t need a response from Obama or his attorneys.There’s nothing they can do to fight this case… It’s over folks !!!

CASE CLOSED as soon as THOMAS sees it :))))))))))”

16 November – WordPress suspends “African Press International” for a Terms of Service violation.

16 November – Since they haven’t gotten the $90,000 to pay for a full-page ad in USA Today and a room at the National Press Clue, the “We The People Foundation” decides to go to plan “b”, publishing it in a regional paper. And of course, the usual scare tactic to the faithful.

“To be effective, we would need to publish the open letter two weeks or more in advance of the date (December 15, 2008) when the Electoral College’s state electors are certified and cast their votes. If Mr. Obama is not able to prove his eligibility by then, the electors would have to cast their votes for someone else for it would be treason to the Constitution to do otherwise.”

They also publish the “evidence” they have. Which is the old stale claim about the COLB not being legit, (Claiming it was “generated by officials of the state of Hawaii, purportedly at the direction of the Governor and two U.S. Senators. “), and the tired demand for the “vault copy”, (which they would figure out a way to disprove.

They also vomit up the Berg lawsuit and Berg’s claims about being born in Kenya, Indonesian citizenship, etc. etc. And end with the absurd claim that:

“Given the relative strength of the evidence and the public interest in the issue, Mr. Obama is obligated to respond to any citizen’s Petition for Redress of the apparent violation of the Constitution’s natural born citizenship clause.We the People demand and deserve nothing less.”

Yes, you read that correctly. They believe that President-elect Obama has an obligation to reply to ANY tinfoil hat-wearing flavor-aid drinker who can’t wrap their brain around the fact he was born in Hawaii and never lost his US citizenship.

17 November – “America’s Right” gets feedback from Alan Keyes camp about their lawsuit. Jeff Schreiber’s opinion is, however much he would like to see one of these cases prevail, it’s bound for dismissal with the rest.

“Keyes’ chances, in my opinion, boil down to whether the element of redressibility is included in the test for standing for this particular cause of action. Because he did in fact appear on the California ballot along with Barack Obama, it seems likely that Keyes could very possibly show the injury-in-fact and causation that Robinson–and Philip Berg, and others–could not, especially considering the “sliding scale” approach to injury-in-fact employed by Berg in his petition for writ of certiorari, but the question remains as to whether redressibility is a factor. Alsup expressed, in the Robinson decision, doubts that striking McCain from the ballot could have significantly helped Keyes in California and beyond — if redressibility is figured in as an essential element of standing here, the Ambassador might run into the same problem.Considering what I believe will be the eventual outcome of this matter, as well as the final dispositions of the other related matters filed from coast to coast, I cannot help but be disappointed that none of these cases have been heard on the merits. Of course, I understand completely the reasoning behind the standing doctrine, but that doesn’t mean I have to like it.”

17 November – Comments on Berg’s website are just as insane – and racist – as ever

written by ObamaSlammaJamma, November 16, 2008
G-d help us. Obama is the embodiment of Satan and will cause the end of Israel and the U.S. and civilization as we know it. He marks the beginning of Islamization of the West. Only China will be left to resist.
Obama’s IQ, Kenyan IQ, Affirmative Action
written by OsaBamaBinMamaMasaiMara, November 15, 2008
More than two dozen African nations have IQ’s lower than 70, and their Gaussian distribution proves that not a SINGLE one of the residents there would possibly have an IQ high enough to be admitted here without affirmative action.
It’s important to KNOW that obama is no exception. He got in strictly because of affirmative action.

written by OsaBamaBinMamaMasaiMara, November 15, 2008
kenai: “The end results of these facts is that Mr. Obama is currently an illegal U.S. alien, all of which prevents him from serving as a United States President.”

I couldn’t agree more. Obama is an ALIEN ZOMBIE and CANNOT legally serve.
I see the ‘adobe” in the document’s hex code -it’s forged alright
written by ObamaSlammaJamma, November 15, 2008
I used HexEdit on a Mac and searched “adobe”. It’s still there clear as day. They tried to doctor it up some more, but they couldn’t get rid of that file code. They’re f*cked. Or should I say America is for letting this happen to us. I’m more terrified than I’ve ever been in my 46 years. Oh, and besides being a criminal and an angry Islamic minority man, he is way too young and criminal to have his white-palmed, brown finger on the nuke button. The ultimate Jihad is a heartbeat away. Everyone remember to kiss your children and tell them how much you love them. This could be it for the world as we know it and the end to cultural civilization. Hello Islam and stoning of 13 year-old gang-rape victims as “adulterers and amputation of hands for shoplifting. Say hello to Islam.”

19 November – Anti-semite Andy Martin reports on the supposed “vigorous hearing” he had in Honolulu circuit court on 18 November.

“We had about a half-hour hearing,” Martin states. “Both the Attorney General and I vigorously presented our respective positions. The Court gave no indication of when or how the ruling could come or what the result will be.“I have ordered a transcript of the hearing and as soon as it arrives we will post it on our blogs. People should be able to read the arguments in Court. Rather than characterize what was said, I will allow everyone to review the presentation for themselves.”

Andy Martin also visits Punchbowl, aka the National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific. And shows either a major lack of information on how a National Cemetery works, or a willingness to use the dead to make a cheap shot.

“Tuesday afternoon through the gracious assistance of a local supporter I was able to visit the National Cemetery where the ashes of Barack Obama’s grandfather are interred. The Punchbowl Cemetery is very still, and very moving. I am always brought to deep emotion by the graves of the unknown, known only to God, who answered the call and gave their lives in our service. The famous war correspondent Ernie Pyle is also buried at Punchbowl.“Sadly, there was no ornamentation or remembrance at the plaque of Stanley Dunham. Obama’s memorialization of his family members seems to be limited to the occasional photo op. I hope to have a detailed column on Madelyn Dunham’s memorial as soon as possible, but Wednesday we will be busily working away in the Courthouse again. We are trying to utilize our time in Honolulu as intensively as possible.”

My father is buried at a National Cemetery, so I can answer a couple details…

Grave markers are provided by the VA. They are standardized as to size and shape depending on if it’s used for a burial of a body or internment of cremains. As for graphics or “ornamentation”, quote:

“The VA only permits graphics on Government-furnished headstones or markers that are approved emblems of belief, the Civil War Union Shield, the Civil War Confederate Southern Cross of Honor, and the Medal of Honor insignias.”

It can take a few months for a marker to be made and delivered, so if Madelyn Dunham’s remains are to be buried with her husband, then the marker may not be there for a while. The cemetery also tends to be hard-nosed on leaving items behind. Obviously Mr. Martin doesn’t know this – or more than likely, doesn’t care and wanted to get a cheap shot in.

And the cheap shot may be all he had, since according to the Hawaiian State Judiciary website, case # 1CC08-1-002147, Martin vs. Linda Lingle et al, was denied on 18 November, ruling against Martin and in favour of the state.

Court Minutes Agenda
Case Title: Andy Martin vs. Linda Lingle et al
Case # 1CC08-1-002147
Div: 1C21
Cal. Type: CM
Cal. Date: 11-18-2008
Time: 1030A

1. Motion for order to show cause (MVT: A. Martin) – DND (Denied)
2. Motion to dismiss complaint for declaratory – GRT (Granted)

Judiciary 1

Court Minutes Text:Presented Any Evidence to the court that irreparable harm will occur if the records are not provided to the plaintiff
In Addition, there is insufficient evidence to indicate that the public interest supports the granting of the relief sought and there is a reasonable belief that the public would rather preserve the confidentiality of vital health records.
Therefore, the emergency motion to show cause is denied. Defendants’ counsel to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law.


No word on Martin’s website yet as of 20 November…..for some reason…..I’m sure it’s an oversight…..

19 November – “African Press International” is booted off of Tripod for TOS violations. They seem to back on WordPress though.

19 November – Jeff Schreiber at “America’s First” says decisions on the Berg and Donofrio cases could be imminent. He also mentions the internet rumour that Justice Souter, had ordered President-elect Obama to provide his birth certificate, saying “the Court merely set December 1, 2008 as the date by which the respondents–Obama, the Democratic National Committee and Federal Election Commission–were to respond to Berg’s petition if they chose to do so at all. “

Basically the Federal Election Commission has waved their right to respond to Berg’s petition for Writ of Certiorari.

“There are a number of reasons why the respondents here would choose not to respond. First, because the Court only grants between 70 and 120 of the 8,000 or so petitions it receives every year, perhaps they just liked their odds of Berg’s petition getting denied. Second, because they have made arguments as to Berg’s lack of standing several times at the district court level and beyond, perhaps they felt as though any arguments had already been made and were available on the record. Or, perhaps the waiver shows that the FEC and other respondents do not take seriously the allegations put forth by Berg, and did not wish to legitimize the claims with a response.Another thing which is not completely clear is whether the FEC is filing for itself or on behalf of all respondents. On the docket, the FEC’s attorney is noted as being the attorney for all respondents; on yesterday’s docket entry, it states that the waiver was filed by “respondents Federal Election Commission, et al.” As it were, the FEC’s attorney, Gregory Garre, is with the Solicitor General’s office, and does not represent Obama or the DNC. While attorneys acting on behalf of a group of defendants or respondents is not necessarily rare, the difference here is the involvement of the Solicitor General’s office, a federal office.”

Berg, of course, is firmly into tinfoil hat land, saying:

“If it were just the FEC filing the waiver, I must say that I’m surprised,” Berg said. “I’m surprised because I think they should take the position that the Supreme Court should grant standing to us. I think they have a responsibility not only to Phil Berg, but to all citizens of this country, to put forth a sense of balance which otherwise doesn’t seem to exist.”“However, if this was filed by the FEC on behalf of the DNC and Barack Obama too, it reeks of collusion,” he said, noting that the attorney from the Solicitor General’s office should be representing federal respondents and not the DNC or Obama.”

Actually, as a (now former) Senator, one could argue that President-elect Obama would be under representation of the Justice Department.

As for Donofrio, his case has been given to Justice Thomas, and will be discussed by the Court in conference on 5 December 2008.

This looks like fairly standard procedure, but the Berg bots and the others who drank the COLB flavor-aid are believing Justice Thomas are on their side, (doubtless if Justice Thomas rejects it, they’ll claim it was due to race, and not the fact it’s completely without merit.)

20 November – And the “We The People Foundation” once again pleads for money to run their ad. Having not gotten the $90,000, but having managed to get the faithful flock to be shorn of $27, 131, they’re scaling back a bit.

“As of noon today, we have raised $27,131.04, which is sufficient for a full-page in the Chicago Sun-Times and the event at the National Press Club, but not enough to cover the cost of a team of forensic scientists to travel to Hawaii to examine the vault copy of the birth certificate or the cost of mailing a package to each of the state electors in the event Mr. Obama chooses not to respond to the open letter (see latest draft of our Open Letter for details). We are willing to commit now to publish in the Chicago Sun-Times as soon as its legal department approves the content. However, we will need additional funding, so please continue spreading the word about the project. Become a WTP “fund raiser.”

For starters, how are that “team of forensic scientists” going to have access to said vault copy, considering that the Hawaiian court system just told anti-semite Andy Martin “No, you can’t have a vault copy, not yours”??

Anyway, their current demands are:

“On Monday, December 1, we will publish the Open Letter that will ask Mr. Obama to immediately direct the appropriate Hawaiian officials to allow access to the vault copy of his birth certificate by our forensic scientists on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, December 5, 6 and 7, and to arrange to have certain other evidence delivered to the National Press Club by noon on December 8, 2008.On December 8th, we will sponsor a Press Conference at the National Press Club. We will invite C-SPAN to broadcast the event live. Invited speakers will include constitutional scholar and attorney Edwin Vieira, who would speak about the natural born citizen clause and the seriousness of the adverse consequences of having a usurper in the position of President of the United States of America. Other invited speakers include the licensed attorneys from each of the cases that have been filed (Phil Berg from PA, Leo Donofrio from NJ, and Orly Taitz from CA), a Plaintiff from the CA case (Alan Keyes), and the Plaintiff from the HI case (Andy Martin).

Beginning December 9th, should Mr. Obama fail to respond to the repeated judicial Petitions for Redress of the Grievance, packages will be mailed to each member of the Electoral College. The package will contain: (a) a copy of each of the lawsuits with their facts and legal arguments; (b) notification that Mr. Obama had a duty to respond to the court challenges by proving his eligibility but chose not to do so; (c) notification that the chief election officials of their states had a duty to determine Mr. Obama’s eligibility before deciding to place him on their primary and general election ballots but failed to do so; (d) notification that Mr. Obama had a duty to respond to the Open Letter published in the newspaper (yet another Petition for Redress) but failed to do so; and (e) notification that in light of the evidence that Mr. Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States and Mr. Obama’s deliberate decision not to answer the repeated Petitions for Redress of the Grievance, it would be treason to the Constitution should they cast their vote for Mr. Obama to be President of the United States of America.

Any President-elect and member of the Electoral College should be withdrawn from office whose fraud and misrepresentations are leading us to dissolution. It may, indeed, injure them in fame or fortune; but it saves the Republic.”

So, let me get this straight. They’re going to demand THEIR “forensic scientists”, (no doubt the return of “TechDude” and “Polarik”) have access to the vault copy, rather than oh, I dunno, objectively neutral ones? They’re going to have a press conference jam packed with the lead nutjobs in the Cult of the COLB to rehash their old tired and dismissed claims, and if THAT doesn’t work, they’re going to supposedly send each Elector copies of a batch of rejected and failed lawsuits??

Good luck with that.

21 November – And while anti-semite Andy Martin hasn’t said anything about his case being dismissed, the Honolulu Advertiser feels no such restraint.

“Judge Bert Ayabe upheld arguments from Gov. Linda Lingle’s administration that Martin — a political opponent of Obama — had no standing under state law to obtain a copy of the document.The decision, issued late Wednesday, first denied Martin’s “emergency motion” for production of the birth certificate.

Martin “does not have a direct and tangible interest in the vital statistic records being sought, namely the birth certificate of President Obama,” Ayabe wrote.

Martin did not fall into any category of persons defined under state law as having a legal right to the record, said the judge.

Ayabe wrote that Martin also failed to demonstrate that “irreparable harm will occur if the records are not provided to the plaintiff.”

At what point does it start to dawn on these people that EVERY SINGLE CASE THEY’VE FILED HAS BEEN DISMISSED and maybe, just maybe, the reason why is there’s absolutely no evidence for their claims??

Yeah, I know, when hell freezes over…..

The Riverdaughter Interview and Brad Explains the Trailer

This is my consolation-prize interview with Riverdaughter, after Darragh Murphy hilariously stiffed me.  You can even hear Kim (Riverdaughter) smirk as she acknowledges that Darragh’s departure was set before she agreed to the interview.  The interview for her film.

Somewhere in there are references to the fracas downstairs, when a bunch of PUMAs went apeshit and tried to throw me out of the house I had been invited to.

The second video features Kim’s hilarious meltdown, which I hope Brad puts in the film.  She’s trying to figure out how to mute Christina on my phone, and finally just decides it’s her new pet phone, and puts it down at her feet.

The last is Brad trying to take the rap for Darragh’s jokey retelling of a murder solicitation.  Don’t let him.  Unless you can think of a context that makes that OK.  And definitely not until you hear MamaPuma’s interview (coming sooon).Riverdaughter Interview


In the doldrums – Cult of the COLB update

While the convention goes on and PUMA licks their wounds after the 1-2 punch the Clintons gave them, the Cult of the COLB has been quiet for the most part. Philip J. Berg’s lawsuit is really the only thing going on at this time. While “TexasDarlin’s” blog isn’t as dark as she claimed, nothing really new there either.

23 August – the ultra-right-wing “news” site “World Net Daily” has an article on the Berg lawsuit. They’re not kind.

“Philip J. Berg, a former member of Pennsylvania’s Democratic State Committee and former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania, filed the lawsuit this week in U.S District Court, asking the court to declare Obama ineligible for the presidency and to prevent him from running for the position.However, a WND investigation has found that at least part of Berg’s lawsuit relies on discredited claims.”

You know you don’t have a case when even World Net Daily says the claims are “discredited”. Especially when WND is claiming that the COLB is legit:

Also read : PSST- Obama was born in Hawaii, wipe the egg off your face.

“A separate WND investigation into Obama’s birth certificate utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic. The investigation also revealed methods used by some of the bloggers to determine the document was fake involved forgeries, in that a few bloggers added text and images to the certificate scan that weren’t originally there.”

Wonder, when they’ll claim WND, is “Pro-Obama”??

23 August – Philip J. Berg posts more info about his lawsuit. Including a “forensic analysis” of Sen. Obama’s COLB.

“Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery. Why? Why a COLB (certificate of live birth) forgery? That is the question.My deepest thanks and appreciation our forensic analyst’s unwavering commitment to the truth despite the threats and harassment, the slashed tires and the dead animal on his porch.

The analyst is an active member of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, American College of Forensic Examiners, The International Society of Forensic Computer Examiners, International Information Systems Forensics Association – the list goes on. He also a board certified as a forensic computer examiner, a certificated legal investigator, and a licensed private investigator. He has been performing computer based forensic investigations since 1993 (although back then it did not even have a formal name yet) and he has performed countless investigations since then.”

Hmmm…….Doesn’t that last bit sound somewhat familiar??? Especially when it goes on to mention a supposed “dead mutilated rabbit”. The link to “Atlas Shrugs” only confirms the fact – Berg is actually using the long-since discredited “TechDude” as his “forensic analyst” !!!Pardon me, I have to pick myself off the floor from laughing hysterically.

24 August – “Israel Insider” continues their tradition of “no Obama smear too low” and posts an article claiming that FactCheck’s examination of the COLB was faked as well. The neocons at FreeRepublic eat it up.

27 August – The right-wing blog “America’s Right” seems to be the best place for Berg lawsuit updates. Though it’s interesting to note that unlike “TexasDarlin’s” uncritical acceptance of anything the Cult of the COLB threw up, Jeff Schreiber seems willing to be a bit more skeptical. He researched the perjury claim and decided it was “Personally, I believe the perjury claim to be poorly founded, hastily researched, and off-base”. Also:

“According to the District Court’s Web site, the U.S. Attorney’s Office has accepted service on behalf of the Federal Election Commission and, curiously enough, the Democratic National Committee as well.”

28 August – The Washington Times does an article about the lawsuit.

“Mr. Berg said he was contacted about filing the lawsuit by a member or associate of the group PUMA, which was formed to support Mrs. Clinton shortly after she withdrew from the race. Its mission includes denouncing the Democratic Party and Mr. Obama’s nomination.“I really do not believe he is a natural-born citizen,” said Mr. Berg, adding that he is not connected with Mrs. Clinton or her campaign.”

I really do not believe Mr. Berg’s case has a snowball’s chance in hell. Even possible allies are questioning a lot of it. I suspect Mr. Berg is doing it for the media exposure.

The funny thing about his case? It looks like he did a copy, cut and paste on the claims of “Judah Benjamin”, “TexasDarlin”, “TechDude”, and “Polarik”. He even cited Wikipedia entries.

Which means that the defense can subpoena those people to force them to prove their claims. Or even the person that “TechDude” was impersonating. The minute that happens, the game is over – because even if they did appear, (unlikely, since Berg may not even have their real names), they would then have to prove to the court’s satisfaction that they:

1) Are who they claim to be
2) Have the skills, training, and certification claimed as well.

In short, it’s strongly doubtful they could prove a single thing. Already the perjury claim has been chipped away by someone who is AGAINST Obama. Any more of the claims are disproven, (and they would be frightfully easy to disprove), and the entire case falls apart.

The burden of proof is on Mr. Berg, and he’s built a house of cards.

Obama’s Birth Certificate – Fake or Myth? (Part 6 – and Final)

(Note: When I wrote this, I didn’t realize it was going to be so involved – or take up so much time. I had the luck to jump into the point the pond got riled up again. I’ll occasionally post updates from this point, but quite frankly I’d like to discuss other things. I think we’ve presented enough evidence by now to show that “TexasDarlin” and the rest of the wingnuts contributing to this myth are either knowingly pulling a smear campaign, or are so far around the bend that they’re twisting everything to try and make their bet theory fit. In either case, it’s only some PUMAs and some tinfoil hat brigade cranks that are believing it – everyone else thinks it’s a joke.)

4 August – “TechDude” makes an offer of a free trip to Vegas if someone can produce the supposed “original name” on the COLB. I suspect he knows his challenge is safe because there IS no such “original name”. (Betcha a bag of M&M;’s that it will “just happen” to be either Maya Soetoro, Sen. Obama’s half-sister, or her daughter, also born in Hawaii)

What’s funny is that “TechDude kinda coyly hints about is a name being “Adam”, saying “A 3rd party finding the same information – particularly one who does not know me from Adam (teehee) – would be the final nail in the COLB’s coffin.” I do suspect he’s right when he says “I am not some sort of genius”.

It really sets off my bullshit detectors when something as important as they CLAIM it is is being treated like some sort of parlor game. The only reason I can think of why they’re acting coy and treating it as a game is that it IS a game to them.

After this news, there are certain problem in country, to avoid this problem get some safety tips from gunsafereview.net.

4 August – “TechDude” suffers a 1-2 bodyslam.

The first is from “Koyaan”, who does an analysis of “TechDude’s” exclusive and comments that the “evidence” he sites is actually all over the graphic in question, looking more like artifact noise than a “smoking gun”. At this point, the “smoking gun” is looking more like a leaky water-pistol.

“What’s interesting is that the length of this “very small vertical line” is 8 exactly pixels. What makes this interesting is that the JPEG algorithm processes an image in 8 pixel by 8 pixel blocks.So is this really a remnant of a line? Well, if it is, then using the same criteria, there are a number of other remnants of small vertical lines very near to the small vertical line that Techdude points out.

Why are these excluded?

The short answer is that they have to be excluded in order for Techdude to make his case.”

Soon after that, Dr. Neal Krawetz weighs in. And by “weigh in” I mean “rips to tiny pieces”. In an article called “BAD SCIENCE: HOW NOT TO DO IMAGE ANALYSIS”, Dr. Krawetz looks at “TechDude’s” methods, claims, and even claimed credentials. And he’s not happy.

“Intentionally misleading research offends me. Real researchers strive to create the best work possible and are willing to have it put up to peer-reviewed scrutiny. They list their methods and provide enough information for other researchers to replicate the experiment. And good science should be able to draw the same conclusion with different analysis methods. In contrast, fake researchers intentionally doctor their data to support their theories. They do not provide their methods and their conclusions are not repeatable. While it is important to understand how real research is done, it is equally important to analyze and understand fake research.”

Some highlights of Dr. Krawetz’s findings:

Conclusion – “(TechDude’s) analysis combines a selective bias with misinterpreted artifacts and false data. His analysis is a work of fiction.”

Critics – “Since (TechDude) won’t give us his name, can he provide the names of his professional reference who are not also anonymous? Saying “some people have vetted me” is like saying “My mother says I’m smart”. To be properly vetted, we need professional references and not vigorous handwaving with anonymous citations.”

Credentials – “…assuming he has the credentials as he stated, I strongly recommend that the courts review each of the cases where TechDude has played any role. If he has shown this kind of biased, misleading, and false analysis in other cases, then each of those cases should be declared a mistrial.”

Dr. Krawetz makes a VERY valid point. If “TechDude” is so serious about his efforts, then he needs to establish his bona fides and submit his evidence for peer review. The fact he (and “TexasDarlin”, et al) are playing games like “trip to Vegas” and only dribbling out bits and pieces tends to lead people to suspect one thing….

The fraud is not on the part of the COLB, but the people promoting this increasingly wild-assed claim.

4 August – Okay, remember my comment that I would bet money that the “mystery name” supposedly found on the COLB that “TechDude” claims would be Sen. Obama’s half-sister Maya Soetoro??

Well, “TexasDarlin” somehow mysteriously feels the need to reprint a post from 19 July because of it’s “possible relevance to current stories” (supposely some “conflicting information” about Maya’s birthdate – which, amazingly enough, happens to be in the time frame “TechDude” claims he “found” on the COLB.)

Hmmmm…..that bet is looking more and more likely.

4 August – Well, someone on Craigslist is fishing too….

“Date: 2008-08-04, 9:34AM HST

Trying to find anyone that can clarify what their parent’s race is listed as on their Hawaiian birth certificate or Certificate of birth from the early 60s.

• Location: honolulu
• it’s NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 782834334″

UPDATE! Thanks to Sandy, who posted in comments that they were the one who made the Craigslist post. Quote: “I am the person who posted the CL thing in Honolulu. I saw all of the birth certificate crap and wanted to see if someone could finalize what the Father’s Race would say.” So, no, not fishing. Thanks again!)

4 August – And over in the formerly sane “NoQuarter” Larry Johnson himself weighs in on “TechDude’s” supposed “mystery name”. The fact his guess is ALSO Maya Soetoro should come as NO surprise……

Also it’s interesting to note that Larry Johnson is now using “Barack “Barry Soetero” Obama” as well. Echo chamber anyone?

5 August – Damn. I hate being right sometimes.

Just as I predicted, “TechDude’s” supposed “find” in the COLB was indeed Maya Kassandra Soetoro. The “attack the entire family” strategy is now in play. And it’s really freaking transparent – someone “just happened” to discover it and “just decided” to tell “TechDude” to use the Vegas money to ” help retire Hillary’s debt”. And “TexasDarlin” is gushing over her supposed exclusive, telling her rabid readers that “Judah Benjamin, our resident historian and researcher, will be discussing these questions in the coming days.”

And the comments are very much in feeding on their own mode – PUMA Joesph Cannon of Cannonfire dared question “TechDude”, and the politest comment he got back was:

“Joseph Cannon’s marching orders from his beloved Messiah is to try to discredit any attempt to get to the truth behind his COLB by claiming that he could not reproduce the results put out by TD or to try to attack the messenger by attacking his use of a pseudonym. Watch him turn up the volume subsequently and become even more repetitive and boring in hopes that if repeated long enough, his accusations will become more believable.”

They are very, very much pimping the “Barry Soetoro” line, claiming “He did not want his legal name and Indonesian identity to be known.”. You know, this could be useful – if the person who’s telling you the latest Obama tale calls him “Barry Soetoro”, you know for sure they’re a complete and total fruitcake and not to bother trying anything like logic and common sense.

And of course, the formerly sane “NoQuarter’ is just orgasming with delight over this suppposed story.

As I said, it was transparently obvious who the “mysterious name” was going to be. Never mind “TechDude” could have claimed to have discovered “Mouse, Mickey” on that COLB, it would have been JUST AS VALID as anything else he found. But this way they can try for a double-header – attack Sen. Obama’s sister AND pretend she’s another woman that Sen. Obama “has thrown under the bus”.

The people pimping this myth are either delusional, or a pack of liars. I used to think delusional. Now, I’m completely convinced they’re a pack of liars. The sad part is the audience that is so desperate to believe their lies.

And with that comment, I’m wrapping up part 6 of what started to be a 3 part series. I may do the occasional update, but for the most part I’m done with what I set out to do.

It’s been interesting, but there’s something I discovered along the way:

Everytime I came out of researching the PUMA sites pimping this conspiracy, I feel like I just waded though an open sewer. A VERY dirty open sewer, filled with very dirty people.

They’re not the type of internet nutter you can point at and laugh. After a while, you discover it’s the type of internet nutter that makes you more and more angry. Doesn’t matter if you’re left-wing or right-wing, (there are right-wing blogs taking the Birth Certificate nutters apart as well).

It’s the type of insanity and unclean feel one feels when reading the “Westboro Baptist Church” or simular website. There’s not much difference between the Fred Phelps of the world and the “TexasDarlin” types. The only difference is what the focus of their hatred is.

And it’s a type of insanity that threatens to draw you into it. Until the idea of fighting it becomes as much an act of insanity as believing it.

I choose not to fall into that well of crazy. The people who want to believe it WILL believe it, despite all the evidence you find to prove them otherwise. I’ve proved to my satisfaction – and others – that there’s absolutely no credible proof or evidence to support their theory, and I will leave them to their insanity.

Idiots- Obama didn’t remove the Flag from his plane.

Hello again Democrats! It seems like there is a budding new rumor! “Obama removed the American Flag from his plane because he’s big narcissist and unAmerican!” Who is falling for this crap? Well, this douche Republican operative right here, Ray Snitchell, which is linked by Just Say No Deal. Hey JSND- I thought you were a coalition of life-long Dems??? Ahhh- Gotcha!

Hey Ray, what’s that? Yeah that– look, right there–


Do you know what that is by the registration numbers and fuselage? It’s an American Flag, idioto!

And who is Ray? He is the creator of “Chicago against Obama”..  He is a Democrat, I mean embarrassed Republican. Because according to Ray, “being a Republican isn’t cool,” (Ray should know). So he is one anyway! He’s bringing GOP sexiness back I guess.

Anyhow, all Presidential planes are decorated PUMA ray. Try harder.

Have you seen McCain’s plane? It has “McCAIN” emblazoned right across the side. Like so (thanks Patrick):


Oh my God! Where is McCain’s American FLAG!!! Why is his American flag missing!!!

Good lord you fools are gullible!

How can you deny McCain’s subtlety. Obviously Obama is the arrogant jerk with his plane:


The plane that doesn’t have a name written across the side in bold HUGE letters. YEAH- how narcissistic.…