Like ants. Really dumb ants. - Berg/COLB update
For those both stubborn and soft in the head, who are willing to believe anything no matter how stupid, I present this short course in "What you Must Believe to Be a Birther".
You must believe Obama was born in Kenya. And Hawaii. And maybe even Canada.
You must believe that a US citizen woman who marries a non-citizen man cannot pass on her US citizenship despite what US law says.
You must believe that when a US citizen woman marries a non-citizen man, she loses not only her US citizenship, but her already-born children's US citizenship despite what US law says.
You must believe that a parent's actions can revoke a child's US citizenship despite what US law and multiple Supreme Court rulings say.
You must believe an Indonesian school record shows the truth about Obama's religion, citizenship, and adoption status, but doesn't show the truth about his birthplace.
You must believe a divorce record that doesn't say anything about a child's birthplace shows proof that Obama was born in Kenya.
You must believe a divorce record that doesn't say anything about an alleged adoption shows proof that Obama was adopted in Indonesia.
You must believe an edited tape that was though two translators and involved Obama's stepgrandmother that wasn't married to his grandfather until AFTER his birth, tells the truth about Obama being born in Kenya, but the part where the she and the translators insist repeatedly that he was born in Hawaii is a hacked internet forgery.
You must believe that the minority opinion in Supreme Court rulings (United States v. Wong Kim Ark) means more than the majority decision of that ruling.
You must believe that the majority opinion in Supreme Court rulings (Perkins v. ELG) that says someone is "to be a natural born citizen of the United States." doesn't really mean that person is a "natural born citizen of the United States."
You must believe that the Constitution says that to be a "Natural Born Citizen" one must either a) have both parents be a US citizen, and/or b) must have their father be a US citizen, despite the fact that nothing in the US Constitution OR US Legal code makes any such claim.
You must believe there is a three-tier system of US citizenship, despite the fact that nothing in the US Constitution OR US Legal code supports this claim.
You must believe that nameless, faceless internet "experts" that offer no proof of their training, experience, background or anything else, and show absolutely no evidence they have any idea what they're talking about, are somehow more reliable than real computer forensic experts and graphic arts professionals willing to put their names and reputations on the line.
You have to believe a non-profit agency based out of the University of Pennsylvania, and started by a (Republican) former Ambassador in the Ronald Reagan administration, is somehow a leftist front hiding things for Obama.
You have to believe a Republican Governor that campaigned for Sen. McCain, sealed Obama's records to help Obama, despite absolutely no evidence supporting this claim.
You must believe that Obama has spent millions of dollars hiding "evidence", despite the fact that most of the cases have been against state officials and state agencies instead of Obama, and the only input from any of Obama's lawyers in the few cases filed directly against him have been boilerplate "move to dismiss" motions.
You must believe that any of the cookie-cutter cases filed are going to be the "great white hope" that prevents Obama from taking office, even though there's not been a case that's gone to trial yet and a great many cases have been dismissed.
You have to believe a 9/11 "truther" conspiracy advocate attorney who has been professionally sanctioned in court before, an "internet powerhouse" who was denied admission to the bar due to psychological issues, a lawyer who moonlights as a performance artist and professional poker player, a dentist who got her law degree on-line, a DUI lawyer, a far-right attorney who has been fined in court cases due to his behaviour, a tax cheat who's been repeatedly under investigation and cited by a court for tax evasion, an unknown historian that goes by the name of members of the government for the Confederate States of America, and other legal lightweights somehow have more understanding of Constitutional law and US legal codes than the Supreme Court of the United States.
You must believe there's a huge conspiracy involving the news media, (both far-left and far-right), every branch of government, both major political parties, state officials in every single State of the Union, the Governments of Kenya, the United Kingdom, and Indonesia, Google, the Trilateral Commission, the Iluminati, Lizard People, Freemasons, and other groups and agencies, to hide the "evidence"
You have to believe the defenders of truth in the media are a NeoCon "news" outlet, the on-line portion of a Russian newspaper historically known for propaganda, and a supermarket tabloid.
You have to believe the Military will rise up and overthrow this conspiracy, despite the fact that active duty personnel donated to Obama 6:1 over McCain.
You have to believe there is this groundswell of public support of tens or hundreds of millions of people in this country demanding answers to your demands, even though the largest crowd at a rally has been well under 75 people.
You have to believe that groundswell will rise up and overthrow the government if they don't get answers, even though the majority of voters in this county voted for Obama and he has an 82% approval rating.
You have to believe a cadre of unknown and semi-known bloggers, many of which have a reputation for making stuff up, have somehow uncovered this huge conspiracy and threat to the US Constitution.
If you can believe all that and more without once questioning it or demanding proof, then congratulations, you're a Birther!! Or certifiable!! Or both!!
Oh, and if you're a PUMA Birther, you have to rabidly condemn sexism while using sexist slams and attacks against any female member of Obama's family, be it grandmother, mother, wife, or daughters.
30 December - And the latest Great White Hope, a claim that 26 states haven't reported their electoral votes.
"Currently, Obama only has received 170 electoral votes. The deadline for submitting the votes was last week. Congress will meet on January 8th. Can Congress over-ride the Delegates if they did not give Obama his minimum required of 270?
I am told this is the first time in history that many Delegates did NOT report in or submit their votes by the deadline. I have been told that Indiana ALL voted "Present" and cast zero votes. Can SCOTUS over-ride the delegates and just make Obama POTUS?
Some say that no one has a right to file a lawsuit until on or after Janaury 8th that is why SCOTUS refused Leo and Cort's cases. Some say SCOTUS planned a strategy assigning Phil Berg's case to January 9th when he does have standing. I believe that the longer SCOTUS waits the more damage will be done."
This comes from a Lisa Karres at "Team Sarah", a pro Sarah Palin website..
The post ends with:
"Those who are aware that only 24 States have reported are beginning to get a sense of renewed hope that perhaps the electors have done the right thing by contesting Barack Obama’s natural born status. Some are even saying that Sarah Palin still has a shot at being VP, or as one person has stated, perhaps even POTUS."
Yeah, you keep thinking St. Sarah Moosekiller, Huntress and Protector of the North, will swoop down on her snowmachine and save you all from Obama taking the oath of office. I'm sure that will comfort you on the 21st and you're still trying to cope with President Obama.....
31 December - Anti-semite Andy Martin was one of the people pimping the Obama "Muslim Smear", so it's not suprising that he ends the year with "Barack Obama’s obsession with Islam"
"In all fairness, as my investigation in Hawai’i into Obama’s past progressed, I came to believe that “Barack Obama, Senior” was not BHO’s father. Rather, I now believe that Frank Marshall Davis was Obama’s biological father. Obama’s mother, Davis and Obama’s “father” had cooked up a scenario to protect the already-married Davis. CNN tried to make a big issue out of my claim that I no longer believed Obama was “born Muslim.” Well, I was wrong. Because I believed Obama about the facts of his birth, which turned out not to be facts at all.
But Obama was raised Muslim, in Indonesia, and his family registered his religion as “Islam” at one of his Jakarta schools. Those are documented facts. Obama’s own sister has admitted the family attended mosque on holidays.
Why did Obama suddenly come out of the closet and start parading his religious obsession with Islam? He thinks he can now get away with it."
Martin ends his rant with:
"In the meantime, while Little Barry Obama chills in his $9 million bunker in Hawai’i, the Israelis are blasting unarmed women and children into heaven with American taxpayer-supplied weapons. Rather than having “only one president,” right now it looks as though America doesn’t really have any president. Will we really have a president on January 20th, or is Barry Obama just all smoke and mirrors? And Islam? Little Barry Hussein Obama."
Andy Martin seems to be, oh, I dunno, an attention whore?
31 December - Dr. Orly's zampolit, Robert Stevens, posts another strawman attack on someone who dared to question the party line on their blog.
"This character purports to be astounded that one thousand dollars was spent on some public record that has been available since 1964 for twenty dollars. Actually, one thousand dollars is nothing. At this point, the legal fees spent by Obama to hide his past are probably up in the many hundreds of thousands of dollars. And the value of the volunteer labor and pro-bono legal work by those questioning Obama amounts to probably even more. There have been at least 4 major full page newspaper advertisements that have cost many tens of thousands of dollars. There have been tens of thousands of dollars of FEDEX charges and thousands upon thousands of certified mail expenses and regular postal expenses. A lot of money has been spent. Because Obama has steadily refused, for many months now, to produce a 10 dollar document."
Actually, not that much money has been spent fighting these absurd claims. None of them have gone to any sort of trial at all, and the vast majority of them are against State officials Look at Dr. Orly's two, Keyes v Bowen and Lightfoot v. Bowen. Both of them are against Debra Bowen. California's Secretary of State. It's the taxpayers of California paying for these things, not Obama.
The only ones Obama's lawyers have done any sort of defense on is Berg's cases. And even then, the lawyers used a common template for the motions to defense. But I asked an attorney about this, Tesibria at "What's Your Evidence", and she said this:
"From what I know, only a couple (at most) cases were actually responded to by Obama. In fact - the ONLY one I kNOW about is Berg. And that consisted of motion to dismiss (mostly standard/likely from a template); second motion to dismiss (repeating same; easy); motion for protective order (standard; likely from a template); and the one appellant brief (opposing emerg. motion; again, repeating prior stuff).
I did see one FreeRep. post in which someone asked for a source and got a response, essentially, "I don't need any source; all I need is knowing Obama's army of attorneys...."
In other words, they pulled it outta their beehind :)"
Even more amusingly, Zampolit Stevens goes on to say:
"Why might Obama's mother or his adopted father have written "Honolulu" as the birthplace on the Indonesian school registry? Why would an Indonesian official have written "Honolulu" as the birthplace on the Indonesian school registry? There are lots of potential reasons:
(1) It could have been a mistake or the result of a misunderstanding. After all, Obama had been living in Honolulu, or might have been, before going to Indonesia. This is not particularly clear. The school official or Leo Soetoro might have just assumed it was true. After all this was not a super important document; just a school registration.
(2) Stanley Ann Dunham registered the foreign births of her other two children in Hawaii, possibly to give them access to the rights and privileges of American citizenship or a connection with the US if they wanted it later. Why not Obama as well?
After all, Dunham expressed disdain for the US, as did her parents, but still maintained a connection with the US when it was to her advantage, such as working for US foundations. This is not uncommon among those who style themselves as "radicals and revolutionaries". They work to attack the system, while still taking advantage of what the system has to offer. Anyone familiar with William Ayers?
(3) Perhaps Dunham was "hedging her bets" a bit. After all, did she want to burn her bridges with the US, where she had been raised and her parents lived ? She had no problem with abandoning Obama at a young vulnerable age and leaving him with his grandparents to raise. This was clearly far easier to do if Obama had some connection with the US. Maybe she had thought about this in the back of her mind for a while as a possibility.
(4) Perhaps Dunham did not want to go into a big long drawn-out discussion with a school official about being married to a Kenyan student when she was underage and giving birth in a foreign land and being upset with Islamic practices in that foreign land. Particularly if that school official was Muslim, like most school officials in Indonesia probably were and probably are.
(5) Parents want to give their children every advantage. And they will often go to great extents to give them any potential advantage, including moving to foreign countries or even telling a white lie or two. Some parents will work two or three jobs to give their children advantages they did not have, like access to a college education. Some parents will turn into essentially chauffers, shuttling their children around to soccer practice, ballet, music lessons, club meetings, etc, completely abandoning any private lives they had for their children.
And US citizenship or a connection with the US is perceived to be an advantage. How else does one explain "birth tourism" even, from advanced places like Korea? Is it so hard to believe that Stanley Ann Dunham, who seemed to have a sort of disdain for US rules but still expected to be able to exploit it, would try to retain any potential advantages a connection with the US might offer for her son? After all, Dunham did it for her other two foreign-born children.
(6) Perhaps Dunham had to present some sort of birth documents to the school in Indonesia. And explain why this purportedly Indonesian citizen (who would not be allowed to attend school unless he was an Indonesian citizen, under Indonesian law at that time; recall that he did not begin school until the age of 7 and a half, which is a bit old for a purportedly brilliant student) did not look particularly Indonesian.
Is it so hard to believe that Dunham might have presented a Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth that showed that Obama was born in Honolulu, which she might have obtained easily to retain some sort of advantage for her son? She did this for her other two foreign-born children, after all. And is it that hard to believe that this document might show an incorrect birthplace for young Obama, since the attestation of only one relative was required at the time to obtain a Hawaiian COLB? Or that there was some fancy paperwork done at the Hawaiian Health Department associated with Obama's foreign birth to give him a COLB that had a Honolulu birth location? Which shows up on the long form vault copy, but not on the short form COLB?
Hawaiian law allows these birth records to be changed retroactively in a number of circumstances. And the Hawaiian law on birth records was particularly lax, clearly.
So is it too hard to imagine that Dunham might have taken advantage of this? Particularly to give an advantage to her child, when she did it for two later foreign-born children as well? Why is that so hard to believe?
(7) There are advantages to having multiple passports and associations with different jurisdictions. For example, Obama might have exploited his Indonesian connection to travel to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport. Might Dunham have wanted to develop and retain these connections with different countries for any potential advantages they offered, for herself and her children? "
Notice how Zampolit Stevens doesn't even consider the most likely answer - the Indonesian officials put "Honolulu" as the birthplace because that IS is his birthplace. No, he has to attack Stanley Ann Dunham, claim supposed anti-American attitudes and some gross conspiracy, because his mind is unable to see the logical and most realistic answer is that Honolulu, Hawaii is in fact the birthplace of Barack Obama.
And the original writer seems to dare question Zampolit Stevens:
"Anonymous says:Today, 11:45:30 AM PST
“Robert,
I'll try this again. I will again restate that I am NOT a O-Bot. I am trying to separate "facts from fiction", like everyone else on this issue.
"Truth?, but verify". Good idea. Perhaps you will do that for me on these statements you make:
1. You state that Stanley Ann Dunham registered the foreign births of her other two children in Hawaii. I have heard this numerous times but with no evidence of this ever being provided. Could you please direct me to the Hawaiian birth certificates of these two children/now adults--"truth?, but verify."
2. You state that Obama has spent hundreds of throusands of dollars on legal fees, etc. I have also heard this numerous times but could you please provide proof/evidence of this or direct me to where it exists. "Truth?, but verify."
3. Explain to me why this blog has appeared to attach significance to the "Indonesian school registry"(proof Obama was Indonesian citizen, proof of adoption of Obama by Soetoro), yet, when I point out that the Place of Birth on this doc says Hawaii, by your own words, you begin to provide excuses or downgrade the doc-your own words: "After all this was not a super important document; just a school registration." Hmmmm, isn't this "cherry picking/bit of a double standard?" "Truth?, but verify."
The rest of your comments are just speculation on your part.
All I am trying to do is separate "facts from fiction". And I can certainly tell you it has been very hard with this issue. "Truth?, but verify." I suggest you "practice what you preach."
Second response, will see if this one gets posted."
Betcha that will get deleted - or made into another strawman attack. And "Anonymous" makes a valid point - the birthers rely on that school record to show that Obama is a Muslim, show that he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, show that his name is "Barry Soetoro", show that he lost his US citizenship and became an Indonesian citizen. Yet when it's pointed out that the same school record shows a birthplace of Honolulu, Hawaii, they leap though hoops to try and claim that no, they really didn't mean that....
I want to repeat this because it's very important (bold face mine):
We all know how strongly the Birthers rely on that school record to show that:
1) Obama is a Muslim,
2) He was adopted by Lolo Soetoro
3) His legal name is "Barry Soetoro"
4) He lost his US citizenship and became an Indonesian citizen.
Many of Berg's arguements are based on the "evidence" in that school record.
However, that school record ALSO says his birthplace is Honolulu, Hawaii!! When it's pointed out, they leap though hoops to try and claim that no, they really didn't mean that....
It doesn't work that way. They can't cherry pick evidence in a document. Either the document is as valid as they claim, in which case it shows he was born in the United States, or it's not, in which case the "evidence" it provides is completely in error.
Logical consistency is NOT the Birther strongpoint.....
1 January - The ever-insane "Citizen Wells" starts off the year with his "Hall of Shame" man of the year for 2008
Former Sen. Barack Obama (D - Illinois)
(Current Presumptive President-Elect pending certification of the Electoral Vote)
"Barack Obama is named the US Constitution Hall of Shame Man of the Year for obvious reasons. Obama, whose father was a Kenyan citizen and under British rule, and therefore not a natural born citizen and not eligible to be president, has worked all of the 2008 election year to steal the presidency. What is even more scary, is that Obama was probably born in Kenya, not a US citizen at all and therefore an illegal alien."
It's funny how "Getting the majority of the votes in the primary, then the majority of the votes in the general election" seem to equal "stolen", isn't it? That's like saying people who bought iPods "stole from Microsoft" because they didn't get a Zune instead.
1 January - Ed Hale seems to be making tracks away from his claim about the divorce document between Barack Obama Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham.....
"In his 7:45pm Plains Radio broadcast, this last night, Ed Hale backed down from his prior assertion of having gained even uncertain information about the Barack Sr. / Stanley Ann divorce decree containing language referring to Barack Jr. as being born in Kenya. Instead, Hale referred to an apparently tricky recollection... of an indeterminate person... referring to such a document's generally referring to the place of birth of the children of the divorced parents. That is not what I heard from Mr. Hale on the 31st.
Two people reported during the broadcast that they had contacted Hale's private investigator yesterday, who indicated he did not thoroughly read the documentation and does not know how it addresses Barack Obama Jr. — nor did he make a copy for himself. It would appear that Hale will receive a valid copy of this decree, probably Friday, 1/2. What it states will be what it states. He promises to post and report, as described below."
The writer of this, Arlen Williams, also finds time to repeat that common myth about "hundreds of thousands spent on lawyers"
"Further, it is suspect that Obama has invested what some say is approximately $1M to keep his actual, Hawaiian birth certificate undisclosed — seemingly thematic with "pleading the Fifth." At the very least, it would officially document his father and that is one wheel off his bike to the White House."
I think so far the most realistic estimate I've seen is between $3000 and $5000. After all, most of the suits have been at the state level against state officials, and it's the taxpayers of those states that get stuck with the bill.
1 January - World Nut Daily also gets into the New Year spirit, calling their whole "Natural Born Citizen" bulldada the "Most covered-up of 2008"
"1. Charges that Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen of the U.S. and thus constitutionally ineligible to serve as president
More than a dozen lawsuits have been filed over Obama's eligibility to assume the presidency.
The cases have alleged the Illinois Democrat does not meet the "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
WND launched a petition drive that has garnered some 200,000 signatories who demand that Obama simply provide documentation of his eligibility. But thus far, he has put up a legal defense to ensure his records remain sealed.
Some of the legal challenges have alleged Obama was not born in Hawaii, as he insists, and others have focused on his father's Kenyan citizenship.
Cases brought by Cort Wrotnowski and Leo Donofrio challenged Obama on allegations that dual citizenship – based on a father who was a British subject and a mother who was an American minor – disqualified him from office. Both, however, were turned down by the Supreme Court.
Philip J. Berg, a Pennsylvania Democrat, demanded that the courts verify Obama's original birth certificate and other documents proving his American citizenship. Berg's latest appeal, requesting an injunction to stop the Electoral College from selecting the 44th president, was denied. But the conference on the case is set for Jan. 9.
Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of claimants in a California suit that asked the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the until Obama verified his eligibility to hold office."
Newsflash - it's not that the story was spiked or hidden or any such nonsense, it's because there's NO TRUTH TO IT AT ALL. Your story couldn't get any traction because it's complete fiction from top to bottom, and no journalist worth their pay would touch it with a 10 foot pole - which may be why you only have gotten "The Globe" and the on-line version of "Pravda" to comment on it.....
But that's not surprising, since WND seems to think a "freeped" AOL poll has any validity, saying:
"An unscientific poll by America Online suggests more and more people are having second thoughts about Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.
Those who raised questions about his vague history before the election largely drew scorn from the mainstream media, which cited an online image from Obama's campaign that purportedly proved his U.S. citizenship with a Hawaiian "Certification of Live Birth."
But the latest results from the America Online poll say only 41 percent of the participants now believe there is no issue to be investigated."
Lets see, Freepers, Birthers, and the like have been talking about how to run up the numbers on this *unscientific* poll for weeks now. All this shows is people willing to lie, rather than any "controversy".
2 January - Dr. Orly's Clinic for Impacted Wisdom has a new batshit insane claim. This time a rumour from NeoCon radio talk show host Michael Reagan's website.
"A retired INS agent who worked when Obama came into the United States stated he distinctly remembered Obama because of his 'slick' manners and speech. The agent says that he went back into the INS files and found the information and that Obama came into the USA on a FS-1 pas sport/visa. FS-1 is a foreign student visa clas sification, not a US citizen pas sport. So, who out there can get into the INS files and find Soreto/Obama's record of entry into the USA?"
Wow. Now they're grasping at coffee stirrers, never mind straws.
2 January - Despite claims from Spencer Connerat that his case isn't officially over, the Florida Supreme Court seems to have disagreed, as it says the case was dismissed on 19 December, and Connerat was sent a letter regarding the matter on 29 December.
"Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is hereby dismissed without prejudice because the petition does not set forth a clear legal right. Petitioner's Motion for Immediate Hearing is denied as moot."
2 January - "TexasDarlin" shows her PUMA chops and high regard for her fellow women and distain for sexism by posting her "Official Forecast for 2009", which starts with attacks on Michelle Obama and Donna Brazile, not to mention gems like:
"9. The Convention will hit a bump, though, when the related discovery surfaces that Obama legally became Barry Soetoro in the 1960s when he acquired Indonesian citizenship, supporting assertions made on this blog months ago that Obama concealed his real identity during the Presidential campaign. Obama will once again declare his innocence: “I never realized it was an official adoption.” The overly complicated situation will result in a final session of the Convention in which an Amendment is ratified exempting Barack Hussein Obama for life from any and all Constitutional Provisions. This will be a compromise to those Convention delegates who proposed scrapping the Constitution altogether in favor of a new one called The Barack Hussein Obama World Constitution."
2 January - In the absence of the supposed Obama-Dunham divorce papers that Ed Hale didn't come up with, "Citizen Wells" repimps the Soetoro-Dunham divorce papers, claiming Yet Again that it proves Lolo Soetoro adopted Barack Obama.
"Below is a copy of the Divorce Decree between Stanley Ann Soetoro and Lolo Soetoro that became final on Nov 6 1980. The decree granted divorce and child custody. The document reveals several important details about the marriage dissolution. However, the most important revelation is that Barack Obama and his sister Maya had been legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro:
“The parties have 1 children below age 18 and 1 chidren above 18 but still dependent on the parties for education.”
This information is not mandatory to disqualify Obama from the presidency, however it is more compelling evidence that demands that Obama must step forward with proof that he is eligible."
First off, Earth to "Citizen Wells", why in the world would Lolo Soetoro NEED TO ADOPT HIS OWN DAUGHTER!!!!
Second off, Barack Obama was dependent on his mother for education expenses. She was a party in this divorce. There's nothing in the decree that proves at all that he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, (and even if he was, it wouldn't have affected his US citizenship.
Oh, and speaking of US citizenship, notice the divorce was filed in Hawaii. If Stanley Ann Dunham lost her US citizenship like Berg et all claim, (and by extension Barack Obama), why on earth was this filed in the US rather than Indonesia. Unless, oh, she was still a US citizen and counted Hawaii as her state of residence while she was living overseas........
The more they keep digging for anything to support their idiotic theories, the more they bury themselves.....
2 January - And speaking of divorce paperwork, according to Arlen Williams, Ed Hale really has the Obama-Dunham divorce papers, no really, he does.
"As of this post, PlainsRadio.com (http://www.plainsradio.com) is to have gained a copy of the divorce decree between Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. and Stanley Ann, parents of the man who would be president. The stated intention of Plains Radio is to Web-post what is relevant in them, later this afternoon or evening (Friday, 1/2). They will also discuss it in a special call-in program devoted to the subject, via streaming audio, some time after 6pm, CT. Those are their plans, "Lord permitting," and we will discover whether or not it refers to Barack Junior's citizenship."
This really IS looking like "Michelle Tapes, 2.0"
2 January - OMGWTFBBQ. Dr. Orly's Clinic for Impacted Wisdom has a new one. A rant about Obama's supposed South America ties.......
"And you can draw your own conclusions as to the importance of this passage that was allegedly found on the seized laptops, now confirmed authentic by Interpol: The gringos will ask for an appointment with the minister to solicit him to communicate to us his interest in discussing these topics. They say that the new president of their country will be Obama and that they are interested in your compatriots. Obama will not support 'Plan Colombia' nor will he sign the TLC (Colombian Free Trade agreement). Here we responded that we are interested in relations with all governments in equality of conditions and that in the case of the US it is required a public pronouncement expressing their interest in talking with the FARC given their eternal war against us.You can draw your own conclusions. But in light of his Reverend Wright and William Ayers ties, his adherence to the Marxist black liberation religion, his stance on free trade agreements, and his despising of free-thinking, gun-toting small town America, I will draw my own conclusion too. Obama is a marxist. And while you may not see it, marxist rebels with uranium do."
And ends with something seemingly unrelated, but grabbed from this Spanish-language site - a supposed "Venezuela Identification Card.
From Dr. Orly's comments:
"twe says:Today, 11:37:36 AM PST
“http://chunfly.obolog.com/obama-bolivariano-mismo-103883
The ID card was found on a bus in Venezuela. The bus driver saved it some time ago in case the owner ever showed up to reclaim it, not realizing who the holder would eventually be. The text goes on to say, because of the nature of the card, there is speculation that the card shows that Obama received the same training in oratory as Hugo Chavez...or words to that effect. "
I'm sure Polarik will write a several page document proving it's real, but I don't think it could look more fake it they did it in crayon.
2 January - And Dr. Orly's political officer, Robert Stevens, tries to rally the party faithful into following "Rev. Manning's" demand to write Chief Justice Roberts about that "Long-Legged Mack Daddy"
And the comments:
"Angel Light says:Today, 12:35:05 PM PST
“I have been sending letter to all 9 U.S. Supreme Judges everyday."
Oh, sure, THAT'S gonna work SO well.......
2 January - It says something about how bad the Birther's claims and stories are that the only news outlets giving them any space are 1) World Net Daily, 2) Pravda on-line, and 3) The Globe. #3 continues their fine tradition of journalistic fiction with "Obama Under Fire!"
"PRESIDENT-elect Barack Obama is being hit by shocking charges - it's against the law for him to take office because he isn't a "natural-born" U.S. citizen! A stunning lawsuit by a former government official claims the 47-year-old politician was actually born in Kenya, which would disqualify him from office. GLOBE's Special Report rips the lid off the simmering controversy. It's must reading for every American!"
Of course the Birthers claim that every other media source is part of the conspiracy. Which explains why the only ones they can get are propaganda outlets and 3rd rate supermarket tabloids. Which is why you have comments like:
"Mauka on Dec 31, 2008
It's a sad state of affairs when the only paper willing to expose Obama iand speak up is a tabloid!
r on Dec 31, 2008
If OBAMA was born in another country to parents who do not meet the requirements to pass on US Citizenship to their child, by law he is not allowed to be a US President. There are an awful lot of illegal aliens who have obtained US birth certificates fraudulently, residing in the US.
DIANEHIND on Jan 01, 2009
I GOT AN IDEAL FOR YOUR NEXT STORY.IF OBAMA DID NOT LEGALLY CHANGE HIS NAME,ARE THEY LEGALLY MARRIED?
Black Female Army Captain on Jan 01, 2009
Obama IS NOT a NATURAL BORN U.S. Citizen and if he is sworn in----our government will be neglecting the servicemen and women who will serve under this FRAUD!"
(NOTE: "Black Female Army Captain" is a known PUMA who hangs around The Confluence and TexasDarling. She's running afoul of UCMJ regulations if she keeps this stuff up past 20 January......)
"Philip J. Berg, Esq. on Jan 02, 2009
Obama's attempt to be President is the biggest "HOAX" in the history of our country, in over 230 years! Obama was born in Kenya and therefore, is only a "naturalized" citizen, maybe. Why do I say "maybe?" Because Obama was later adopted in Indonesia and when Obama returned to Hawaii at age ten [10], Obama either went through U.S. Immigration and if so, he would have been given a "Certification of Citizenship" indicating he was "naturalized" because he was a "natural" of Indonesia [because he was adopted and his name became "Barry Soetoro"]. However, if Obama did not go through U.S. Immigration, which I believe, then he would be an "illegal alien" and not only not qualified to be President, but a fraud being a U.S. Senator for the past three [3] years. See my web site: obamcrimes.com"
(Wow, pimping his case in Supermarket Tabloid websites. How desperate can you get??)
"Ralph C. Whitley, Sr. A Veteran on Jan 02, 2009
The DUTY to conduct background investigations of anyone obtaining a Security Clearance remains under the Executive Branch PLUS Congress should demand instantly all running for even City, County, State or Federal Office have complete background investigations to prevent the exact same thing happening in the future. Any Attorney knows WHERE he was born and this fraud must be punished while protecting the innocent children of the Obama family. Ralph Charles Whitley, Sr. A Decorated American Veteran, backflow.prevention@verizon.net
010209"
Desperate much??
2 January - And "Michelle Tapes 2.0" proves to be a dud when Ed Hale gets the Obama-Dunham divorce papers, (well, pages 1-8 plus 12). And finds.....nothing. No Kenyan Birth Certificate, nothing that wasn't already known. They're spinning it as "proof" that Barack Obama Sr. was his father, (well, DUH!):
"This is a court declaration that BHO II is in fact the son of BHO I as has been "naturally" assumed. That means that Barack Obama is constitutionally disqualified from being U.S. President, as this Web log has repeatedly explained and has documented -- along with numerous lawyers, historians, and thoughtful Web surfers."
No, it doesn't mean he's "constitutionally disqualified" to be President, as several Supreme Court decisions and US legal code would disagree with the whole "both parents need to be US Citizens" crap.
Ed Hale's legal adviser during this circus was Stephen Pidgeon of the latest case here in Washington State. Amusingly enough:
"9:50pm CT - Pidgeon reminds us that the Wrotnowski case is still "pending" and procedurally alive."
REALLY?? Funny, the Supreme Court seems to disagree...
Oh, and they're still hoping Ron Paul rides out and saves them:
"PPS: 12:03am CT - In this broadcast, it was mentioned that staunch defender of the Constitution, Rep. Ron Paul of Texas may be getting interested in standing up for Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, in Congress, January 8 -- and hopefully in prior discussions with colleagues. I repeat: we also need a U.S. Senator to protest for the Constitution, a.s.a.p."
2 January - "The Right Side of Life" also flogs Ed Hale's dead horse.
"Therefore, what has been confirmed by FactCheck.org (Leo Donofrio’s take here) has now officially been confirmed by these divorce papers. Granted, this is not exactly breaking news, but it puts legal backing behind the fact that Barack Hussein Obama II’s birth was governed by the UK colonial laws of Kenya in 1961 regardless of where Barack Husssein Obama II was geographically born. In fact, even if Barack Hussein Obama II was born on American soil in Hawaii, his nationality status would have still been governed by Britain!"
Umm, no. He was born in a US state and his mother was a US citizen. As such, his Nationality status is regulated by US law and US code. "Law of Nations" is not part of US legal code, and the nationality of the mother does apply.
They also flog and pimp another dead horse, falsely claiming:
"We now know — via Ms. Sandra Ramsey Lines’ forensic work — that the FactCheck.org and related site’s certification of live birth is on record as being officially debunked"
"Officially" signifies a Government or regulatory agency certified that the JPG files were fake. This is not the case. Ms. Lines said, quote:
"In my experience as a forensic document examiner, if an original of any document exists, that is the document that must be examined.."
Which is funny, because that was also said by Dr. Neal Krawetz. The JPG scans on Daily Kos and the like were never intended to be used to officially establish citizenship, they were intended to show the public that, yes, his name was Barack Hussein Obama and he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii. The idea that he used that scan for OFFICIAL documentation is so idiotic as to defy belief. Except maybe to a Birther......
2 December - And Berg goes "big deal" to Ed Hale and the people at Plains Radio, stating he's had the Obama-Dunham divorce papers for a while.
"Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States and his case, Berg vs. Obama, [is in the U.S. Supreme Court with two (2) Conferences scheduled on 1/09/09 & 1/16/09] announced he had obtained the divorce file of Stanley Ann D. Obama vs. Barack H. Obama which was filed in the First District Court of Hawaii on January 20, 1964. The Obama divorce was finalized on March 5, 1964. Mr. Berg’s office obtained these records several months ago.
The Obama divorce records state there was one [1] child born to the parties on August 4, 1961, a son, by the name of Barack Hussein Obama, II. There is absolutely no mention of where the child was born."
(PDF here)
You know, when BERG says they don't state anything about his being born in Kenya, that's a Real Major Clue you're barking up the wrong tree........
3 January - And, after blaming the Media, mythical "paid bloggers", and more than likely the positions of the moon for the lack of traction the Birthers have gotten with their lied, Dr. Orly's political officer, Robert Stevens, blames a new target - Google. He starts off with a whine for his cheese....
"Those of us wanting to see the Obama Eligibilty Controversy addressed are a rag-tag group of volunteers and amateurs. We do not have the support of the mainstream media, which is still powerful but exercising a waning influence. We do not have the support of most mainstream conservative media, for the most part, including Fox and Conservative Talk Radio. We do not have the support of the Republican Party, which one would expect to be our natural ally. The conservative special interest groups, advocating controlled immigration, gun ownership rights, a pro-life agenda, etc have avoided us, and been essentially silent, although we have reached out to them. We have been branded as fruitcakes, flakes, nutjobs and conspiracy theorists; lunatics who wear tin foil hats, worry about One World Government and the end of the world. Even in the "new media" arena on the internet, getting the message out about potential problems with Obama's eligibility has been an uphill struggle."
Of course you've been "branded as fruitcakes, flakes, nutjobs and conspiracy theorists". You ARE fruitcakes, flakes, nutjobs and conspiracy theorists, after all.
"So at the moment, on the first page of Google-retrieved links, I find seven out of 10 are pro-Obama articles, 2 of which are from the original campaign, and all of which are somewhat doubtful, and two out of 3 blog articles are pro-Obama articles. Most of these articles are weeks if not months out of date. I know that the Googlebots update rankings more frequently than that. It is awfully hard for me to believe that the top-ranked articles from the Google PageRank algorithm on this issue remain two articles from June of 2008, namely the politifact article and the LA Times blog article. Previous searches on google over the last 2 or 3 months showed that the LA Times blog article was the top-ranked hit for weeks on end and has never dropped out of its top ranking until this politificat article replaced it, and the LA Times blog article assumed its current position in second place. Of the three remaining articles, one is the result of a feed from google news, so does not quite count. One is from Youtube, so again it does not quite count. Of the 8 "regular" articles chosen by the Google algorithms for its front page, 7 are pro-Obama. Of the 3 blog articles chosen by the Google algorithms for its front page, 2 are pro-Obama. The pro-Obama articles are almost all wildly out of date. Ancient history, by internet standards.
This is probably the result of either (1) pagerank engineering or (2) intervention at Google. It is fairly easy to get a link to rise in search engine ranks. It mainly involves linking to the site from other highly ranked sites, at least in the case of Google Searches. It would not be too difficult to believe that the Obama internet team, with its funding and depth and resources, would easily be able to accomplish (1). Less likely, but still possible, is that Google itself has "pinned" certain articles to be high ranking. Reportedly Google CEO Eric Schmidt backs Obama, has campaigned for him, and even is being considered for a position in the Obama administration. "
The "I can't be wrong so blame everyone else" mentality is classic paranoia - and conspiracy theory.
2 January - Oh, and Zampolit Stevens references this article from 2 January about getting the GOP to make more effective use of technology in his whine how Conservatives are ignoring the Birthers.
"Finally, and perhaps a bit more contentiously, "openness" is a double-edged sword. There is, frankly, a lot of crazy out there—and a vocal chunk of the rightroots apparently under the illusion that McCain's big lost opportunity was the failure to make sufficient hay of Bill Ayers and amateur forensic analyses of Barack Obama's birth certificate. This, again, is a recipe for death spiral. What gets lost in the "bottom-up versus top-down" frame is that the left has managed a more useful symbiosis between their grassroots and their intellectuals. What seems to be playing out on the right of late, by contrast, is a frenzy of mutual demonization. Pace some of my progressive friends, I don't think the recent flurry of activity in the fever swamps reveals any deep, eternal truths about conservatism per se; it's just what's filled the gap created by the paucity of useful leadership from conservative intellectuals. What's needed right now is less tactical refinement, and more conversation about the agenda tactics are supposed to serve."
Ironically enough, batshit crazy Birther Cris Ericson manages to illustrate exactly this problem in comments.
3 January - and the Birthers are still flogging the "Not All The Electoral Votes are In, YAY" Great White Hope.
"As we’ve just seen, the National Archives, per protocol, coordinates among the 50 States to make sure that the process for Electoral vote ascertainment runs as smoothly as possible. Could it be that the remaining 26 States simply haven’t filed yet? If that were the case, that would seem rather extradordinary, wouldn’t it, considering this clearly isn’t the first presidential election for which they must show votes? Also, we are talking about this being a presidential election; they all have every reason to know that as soon as the Electors sign off on the votes, that ascertainment must be immediately mailed to the appropriate destinations (notice the remark that is recommended to the Postmaster!).
Frankly, I’m not sure if any of the above means anything, except that maybe Congress wants the process to end up in the House, where the Democrats will have even more control over the process (it would be the 111th Congress at that point). There’s nothing at all illegal about that, but the fact that Electoral College votes for more than 50% of the States haven’t been reported yet is very, very strange, in my opinion."
(From what I've read elsewhere, the votes are officially in, the delay is scanning the images onto the web. Useful, but hardly evidence of wrong doing or electoral revolt.)
3 January - And how's this for a "Hail Mary" play - Obama can't be a US citizen, because Hawaii isn't a legal state!! "Jasper James" has been playing TedBot and spamming this over the Birther sites....
"Jasper James // January 3, 2009 at 4:17 am
Another bizare twist to this tail is that Hawaii is not a legal state of the United States! See the following:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/HAWAII/hawaii.html
In 1999, the United Nations confirmed that the plebiscite vote that led to Hawaii’s statehood was in violation of article 73 of the United Nations’ charter. The Hawaii statehood vote, under treaty then in effect, was illegal and non-binding.
The article gives all the details. So basically even if Obama was born in Hawaii - he was not born in a legal U.S. State and is not a NBC."
That's not even grasping at straws - that's sheer desperation.
3 December - And Berg has Yet Another Press Release out, this one pimping the "Globe" magazine.
HELLO!! IT'S A SUPERMARKET TABLOID!! THEY'RE JUST AS LIKELY TO CLAIM THAT OBAMA WAS SIRED BY ELVIS AND BIGFOOT ON A UFO AT AREA 51!!!!
"Berg stated, “This is the 2nd time GLOBE Magazine has highlighted the question of Obama’s lack of ‘qualifications’ to be President. More and more people are aware of the fact that Obama does not meet the ‘qualifications’ and that this is the biggest ‘Hoax’ perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years. When the truth finally comes out, individuals including Barack Hussein Obama, Michelle Obama, Howard Dean [Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC)], other top officials of the DNC and senior campaign staff of Obama’s campaign should be brought into the criminal justice system and indicted and tried with incarceration for those convicted.”
The story is the center spread. There's also a poll where you can Cast Your Vote: Truth or Vicious Smear? Was Barack Obama actually born in Kenya and therefore not legally eligible to serve as President? Or are the mounting claims against him just part of a vicious smear campaign to discredit him? Here's a chance for you to have your say!"
Oh joy. Another unscientific "survey" to freep.....
(The email address to vote, BTW, are:
CitizenObama@globefl.com (If you're convinced Obama is a natural born citizen)
and
NoCitizenObama@globefl.com (If you're convinced he is NOT)
Right now the "Birthers" are mailbombing those addresses.......)
4 January - Playing ethical and moral limbo, Dr. Orly shows how low she can go, reposting a request for someone to visit Madelyn Dunham's brother and have him sign consent forms for the release of the death certificates for Madelyn Dunham and Stanley Ann Dunham.
This also goes with their fishing expedition trying to find out if Obama broke any laws spreading his grandmothers ashes at a beach. (which, honestly it looks like he might have. "Disposal location and measures - Cremated remains
Cremated remains shall be buried in or on ocean waters without regard to the depth limitations specified for non-cremated remains in paragraph 2 above provided that such burial takes place at least three nautical miles from land."
This may have been a simple "oops" on their part. In any case, it's hardly an impeachable offense, since I suspect violators get a simple citation and a fine.
Basically though, they're after some "proof" that Obama lied about his mother's and grandmother's deaths. Case in point from the comments:
"CalifGirlInMaine replies:Today, 10:19:35 AM PST
“Someone made a comment on one blog about the photo of him strewing the ashes -- stated that it was sand, humain cremains are lumpy. I would suppose the only way to prove he actually violated the EPA regs about ashes would be to examine the cliff below where he stood to see if there are any human cremains there. "
Problem with getting Madelyn Dunham's brother to sign anything? The rumours he died a few days before his sister.
Of course, rather than the fact he was 83, Dr. Orly sees some deep dark conspiracy....
"I am really concerned about all of these coincidences, that all of BO's family dies. Even his uncle, Charles Payne, Madelyn Payne Dunham's brother dies right before the election.
We really need to start working hard and getting hospital records, mortuary records, death certificates, coroners reports, probate records for Ann Dunham, Madelyn Payne Dunham, Charles Payne, Stanley A. Dunham"
Theres's a word for this. Sick. Desperate, but sick.
4 January - Dr. Orly continues huffing her patients nitrous oxide her excursion into loonbat land claiming the Seattle Times ran an article about Charles Payne dying 22 Oct, and saying:
"I just remembered reading Larry Sinclair's article on Citizen Wells. According to Larry, an employee of the mortuary stated to him that Madelyn Dunham has died on Oct 22. Did anybody see Madelyn Dunham alive after October 22?
If Larry is correct, then both BO's grandmother and great uncle die or disappear from public eye and unavailable for any questioning or subpoena on the same day, October 22. I wonder what happened on that day or a day before? It looks like something happened that spooked this Adams family. What was it? Can anyone remember any newspaper articles, any public statements happening on Oct 21-22?
Are there any reports of his other relatives being seen after the 22nd? His paternal grandmother Sarah Obama? 3 other wifes of BO sr, particularly the other American wife, Ruth Nidesand (Nidersand or Obama) and her 2 sons David and Mark Ndsandjo (Nidesand, Nidersand, Obama)?"
There's just one problem, (Okay, a whole lot of problems) with her claim. The Seattle Times never published such a thing. This was the article on 22 October:
Obama's grandmother helped mold candidate's character
"Now, just two weeks before the election of his life, that other maternal figure — Madelyn Dunham, who helped raise him — is in such fragile health that family members are gathering at her Honolulu bedside.
The 85-year-old former bank executive is said to be "gravely ill" after falling and breaking her hip, and some reports suggest she might not live to see the results of the Nov. 4 vote.
Whatever happens, she's already lived long enough to see her "Barry" achieve what she'd wanted for him, her brother says.
"I think she thinks she was important in raising a fine young man," said Charles Payne, 83, from his Chicago home. "I doubt if it would occur to her that he would go this far this fast. But she's enjoyed watching it."
Although she was too ill to travel for the campaign, she followed it closely on television — even undergoing a corneal transplant earlier this year so she could watch the coverage.
"She was almost totally blind," Payne said. "She's not physically able to" campaign, he said, "but it doesn't mean her interest has flagged."
Even some of her comments take her to task:
"Loren says:Today, 1:31:33 PM PST
“Do I have any newspaper articles from October 21-22? Yes. I have the exact Seattle Times article you (and Buelah) are referencing:
IT DOESN'T SAY THAT CHARLES PAYNE DIED. To the contrary, it has a couple of quotes from Mr. Payne regarding his sister.
So even though you say "The Seattle times ran an article showing Charles Payne, Madelyn Payne Dunham's brother dying Oct 22, 2008," that's completely false. You obviously haven't even looked at the article you're talking about, and yet you're citing it as a source. Heck, you've already made TWO posts about it, without doing even any cursory research or fact-checking. "
and
"Anonymous says:Today, 1:45:26 PM PST
“Why, that's GOOD news!!! We can once again send a reporter from the Globe to extract a signature from an elderly man."
Thankfully, it turned me on to a new site. May I highly recommend:
Of course, some of Dr. Orly's cavity creeps are using the party line of "o-bot sabotage"
"Anonymous says:Today, 2:25:35 PM PST
“Orly: You warned us of disinformation planted by O-bots. It appears that "Beulah" is one of the Obama paid operatives."
Seems like Dr. Orly can sabotage herself with no "o-bots" needed.....
4 January The Federal Archives reports on their website that Certificate of Vote for all 50 states + DC are in.
It does not look like there is any evidence of "faithless electors", so we can safely assume that the letter/email/phone harassment the Birthers tried with the electors had NO effect at all.
4 January - Anti-semite Andy Martin seems to be off his meds again....
"Why is it that Israel’s Fourth Reich is addicted to war, violence, murder and oppression? For the same reasons as the Third rich in Germany. Israel is a failed state, a failed experiment in which western powers imposed a “state” on the helpless people of the Middle East. The experiment is an embarrassing failure. Sixty years later, Israelis refuse to live in peace with their neighbors; they don’t think they have to. Israel’s Fourth Reich has become the modern embodiment and reincarnation of the Third Reich. And George Bush has blindly gone along for the ride.
Will achieving peace be easy? No. Israel is a well-armed criminal gang; some have called it an army in search of a state. This outlaw state will not yield power easily. That I why the blood of young Israelis must overflow in the feces-clogged sewers of Gaza—clogged because of Israeli blockages of public sanitation and water treatment plants--before Israelis come to their senses.
As a humanitarian and Christian I mourn the waste of any Israeli or Arab life, on an equal basis. I mourn the loss of young men and women who will never enjoy God’s creation, whose lives are cut short by the dreams of greedy politicians. But if lives must be sacrificed, let them be sacrificed for a just and equal peace, not for endless Israeli warmongering and conquest.
In 2000 I propounded the Andy Martin Middle East Peace Plan. Then, the incompetent Prime Minister Ehud Barak was spreading Israeli lies about having “no partner for peace.” It was total Israeli disinformation. Today the same incompetent monster Barak is slaughtering Gazans to save his political career. Israelis go from failure to failure."
4 January - And speaking of sick, it takes a lot of crazy to leave me stunned, but this managed to do the job. On 4 November 2008, just a few days before his release from jail, (he was in jail for three and a half years on child molestation charges), so-called "Pastor" Martin Luther Lindstedt, of "The Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri" filed a civil rights complaint against Obama, McCain, Missouri Gov. Blunt, and about half the world it seems....
After wading though his posts at this website, I was able to piece together a copy of his complaint. I don't know if I should laugh hysterically or become violently ill....
"B. Defendant, u$ Senator Barack Hussein Obama is 'employed' as a professional politician whom the extremely idiotic whiggers of Illinois selected to be their u$ Senator and who the even more idiotic ZOGland whigger ass-clowns, sundry muds and jew cruds are about to (s)elect as president of the u$/ZOG/Babylon as the Democratic Party nominee, but NOT if Plaintiffs have anything to say about it. This Genesis 1:24-25 and 2:19 Sixth-Day mamzer-Beast of the Field has been tracked to its lair at: 713 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20510.
C. Additional Defendants:
Senator John McCain is employed as a professional politician who the Arizona whiggers want as their Senator who is running for President of the u$/ZOG/Babylon. Since the Missouri Republican Party for its part schemed with Democrats to keep White men off the ballot, these whiggers deserve a good swift kick in the ass as well. What's good for the nigger is good for the whigger. This repellant idiot even more corrupt than O'Nigger has been hiding out for 26 years in the District of Corruption/Congoids at: 241 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510
STATE OF MISSOURI, GOVERNOR MATT 'RUNT' BLUNT, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH/FULTON STATE HOSPITAL, ATTORNEY-GENERAL JAY NIXON, SECRETARY OF STATE ROBIN CARNAHAN, all these regime criminals are by Missouri statute to be represented by regimeist Defendant Attorney-General Jay Nixon, whose address is: Missouri Attorney General's Office, Supreme Court Building, 207 W. High Street P.O. Box 899 Jefferson City, MO 65102. "
But wait, it gets...........well, not better.........
"1. The main reason that Plaintiffs are filing this lawsuit is simply that it goes against Plaintiffs religious beliefs to allow any non-white, especially a nigger, to be in any position of authority over any White man, no matter how degraded. Exodus 18:21-26, Deuteronomy 1:13, Leviticus 25:42-48 say that any rulers over Israel were to be of Israel and not of racial aliens or even outsiders. Since Dual-Seedline Christian Identity dogma, the ruling doctrine of The Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri (Missouri Secretary of State Corporation # N00773365) holds that non-whites are the sixth-day beasts of the field, without souls, and are not even to be allowed to live among White Christian Israelites of the Servant Nation of YHWH, much less rule over them, then this lawsuit against lead Defendant Barack Hussein Obama is a religious duty that we dare not shirk.
We could, like other White Nationalist organizations, simply hope and pray for an assassin and enjoy the inevitable race riots which we seek. And we simply as White Men will NEVER obey any nigger president, but rather use this as an excuse for revolt. Unlike the Republican eunuchoid whiggers overheard whining about how "Obama is going to take away our guns," it is not as if we will ever let such a thing come to pass. Plaintiffs as National Socialists have no problem with socialism for the benefit of White people only. We don't think that taking from rich whigger and jew regime criminals running ZOG (Zionist Occupation Government)/Babylon to give to White People is anything but a good idea. However, We do not agree that White People are to provide in any way for non-whites or thieving whigger ('white' nigger) regime criminals and certainly not jews, the literal spawn of Satan whom We are commanded in Genesis 3:15 to hate. Rather such non-whites are to be expelled with extreme prejudice from Israel.
In Plaintiff Lindstedt's 2 1/2 year illegal imprisonment at the Fulton State Hospital (hereafter Nuthouse) as an illegally doped up political prisoner, Lindstedt has observed two racial realities: #1 There is no white man so far gone mentally that he doesn't think himself the infinite superior of any nigger; and #2, There was never a nigger whelped that didn't think that the White man owed him a living over slavery. Thus there is no hope for racial peace once segregation and the laws involving miscegination were unlawfully and under pretext done away with.
It is nonsense to listen to 'Doctor' Martin Luther Kong yap about negros wanting to be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their nappy pelts. It is nonsense because niggers always act according to their nature, wanting to get back to Africa. When Petitioner Lindstedt was under the power of nigger psychiatrists at the Nuthouse he was illegally forced to take psychotropic drugs first under Alicia 'Miz Cleo' Thompson and then under V. Marvelene French. These nigger witch doctors were determined to dope up the racist Klansman White Devil into submission, and even after they were gone from Lindstedt's [mis]Treatment Team, they would force the whigger quacks to continue the illegal doping regardless. They had no more respect for medical ethics or RSMo 630.183 saying that they had to get a kort order to dope up Lindstedt and certainly not for RSMo 630.180 saying that Lindstedt had a right to refuse treatment on the grounds of religious practice than George Bush, Ashcroft, Rumsfelt, and Gonzales had for the Geneva Conventions. Miz Cleo Thompson wrote in Lindstedt's paperwork that if psychotics at the Nuthouse were to attack Lindstedt and he defended himself it was to be deemed that Lindstedt 'provoked' it and Lindstedt was to be punished illegally for this. When nigger inmates attacked Lindstedt, French increased Lindstedt's forced drugs as punishment. They took action so that Lindstedt could not look at his medical records and make corrections of the record. Anyone White who is unfortunate to be under the power of niggers finds out that what happened at Santo Domingo, South Africa and Rhodesia and Reconstruction was no accident. Niggers invariably make life hell for Whites, and no amount of 'edjewcation' will ever change inherent hard-wired Typical Nigger Behavior (TNB), as Plaintiff Lindstedt found out. The only good thing about it was at least the record for never a Klansman ever getting raped by niggers held. One can never appeal to a nigger's better nature, but only to a nigger's inherent fear of the White man. Every nigger thinks that even the most cowardly whigger is a Klansman, and Plaintiff Lindstedt was viewed as the most evil White Devil by the niggers. This resulted in Lindstedt being assaulted only when nigger craziness at the Nuthouse overcame nigger fear. And these ZOGling whigger ass-clown herd animals want to elect one of them as President, the idiots.
Plaintiffs find Defendant Barack Hussein Obama far advanced both morally and mentally over that idiotic hypocrite whigger degenerate John McCain of the Republican Party. Yet it wouldn't matter if Defendant Obama was Jesus Christ, we still will not accept a nigger President. We will not obey a nigger president. And this racial antipathy shall tear apart the ZOGland."
I think I'm going to opt for "sick". Though at least this idiot has the guts to openly state what some of the Birthers won't even admit to themselves.....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd like to end this update with a note for this week (4-10 January)
This week sees three things happen.
On Thursday, 8 January, Congress meets in joint session to count and certify the Electoral College votes. Barring any hanky-panky, (the Birthers are hoping for a Senator and Congressperson to throw sand in the gears), this will officially certify Barack Obama as President-Elect.
Also on 8 January, James Broe of Broe v Reed is scheduled to have his case heart at the Washington State Supreme Court. Dr. Orly claims to have helped in this case. There's nothing new in this case at all, it's a mix of Berg and Donofrio. I suspect it will be dismissed by 13 January.
And on Friday, 9 January, Berg has his request for a writ of certiorari discussed in conference with the Supreme Court. Assuming this conference follows the same pattern as before, there will be no note of it in the release of the writs granted on the 9th, and confirmation will take place the following monday (12 January.)
It is now 16 days before Barack Obama is sworn in as President. Expect the Birthers to get more and more insane, and for more and more legal tricks, last minute filings, and demands for emergency stays to take place. Not to mention trying to throw everything they can against the wall and pray something sticks.

CHALLENGE (with answer), CAN ANYONE PROVE THIS WRONG?:–
1. Constitution Article II requires USA President to be “natural born citizen”.
2. BHO’s website admits his dad was Kenyan/British, not American, citizen when BHO was born.
3. BHO is therefore not a “natural born citizen” (irrespective of Hawaiian birth or whether he may be a 14th Amendment “citizen” of USA) — confirmed in the Senate’s own McCain qualification resolution (that both parents must be citizens of USA) co-authored by BHO.
4. Supreme Court has already docketed two upcoming conferences, 1/9/09 and 1/16/09 — between dates Congress counts electoral votes (1/8/09) and Presidential inauguration (1/20/09) — to address Berg Case and fashion relief on BHO’s eligibility to be President.
5. Since the fact of BHO’s dad being Kenyan/British not in dispute, Supreme Court rules on Summary Judgment to enjoin BHO’s inauguration as President.
6. Therefore, BHO is not inaugurated as President.
7. Vice President Elect Biden is inaugurated Acting President under the 20th Amendment to serve until new President is determined — the procedure for which determination to be set out by Congress and/or the Supreme Court so long as in conformance with the Constitution.
ANSWER TO ABOVE CHALLENGE
IF, when counting the electoral votes, Congress WERE TO find by 1/8/09 that Obama — not being an Article II “natural born citizen” (father Kenyan/British, not American) — fails to qualify as President, Biden would become the full fledged President under 3 USC 19 (free to pick his own VP such as Hillary) AND THERE WOULD BE NO NEED FOR DEFERRAL TO THE SUPREME COURT to enjoin Obama’s inauguration relegating Biden to being merely Acting President under the 20th Amendment until a new President were duly determined.
(The preferable choice, at least for the Democrats, would seem obvious.)
Posted by: Ted | January 04, 2009 at 10:07 PM
Tedbot - I answered this when you posted them as two seperate comments my previous post. Do *try* to keep up, will you??
Posted by: Patrick McKinnion | January 04, 2009 at 10:19 PM
Oh, Ted, it wouldn't be the same without you chiming in.
Posted by: Tracy | January 04, 2009 at 10:31 PM
TedBot - Here's my replies for when your "challenge" was posted as two seperate comments. Again, do *TRY* and keep up. This isn't a Birther blog where people blindly accept whatever your spew du jour is.
1. US Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 says:
"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
2. At least two cases where one or both parents were not US citizens determined that a child born in the US was a natural born citizen.
Wong Kim Ark:
"It was held that a person born within the jurisdiction of the U.S. to non-citizens who "are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity" is automatically a citizen, per the Fourteenth Amendment. "
Perkins v. ELG:
"The U.S. Supreme Court concluded that Marie Elizabeth Elg who was born in the United States of Swedish parents then naturalized in the United States, had not lost her birthright U.S. citizenship because of her removal during minority to Sweden and was entitled to all the rights and privileges of that U.S. citizenship. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the decree that declared Miss Elg "to be a natural born citizen of the United States."
Perkins v. ELG also references a earlier case of a Prussian subject who came to the US, had a son, and returned back to Prussia. Quote:
"'Young Steinkauler is a native-born American citizen. There is no law of the United States under which his father or any other person can deprive him of his birthright. He can return to America at the age of twenty-one, and in due time, if the people elect, he can become President of the United States"
So the citizenship of Obama's father doesn't mean anything. By US law and multiple decisions of the Supreme Court, a child born in the United States is a "Native Born" US citizen and therefore qualifies under the US Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.
3. The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, Section 1. says:
"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Technically speaking, if one is born in the United States - even to two US citizen parents, then one is also a citizen under the 14th Amendment.
4. Berg's cases have not been decided. The track record for such cases is remarkably poor, and there is no reason to believe writ or injunction would be granted.
5. The "facts" in Berg's case are very much in dispute. In the unlikely event SCOTUS would grant Berg's case, all that means is it would be sent back to the lower courts to review their ruling. And there is nothing in Berg's lawsuits - any of them - that would stand cross-examination. Standard legal proceedure for a defendant is to not address issues and move to dismiss. If dismissal is granted, you ignore the issues the plantiff brought up. If dismissal is not granted, then defendant addresses the issues - and Berg's cases would be torn apart if that happened to him
6. Unlikely.
7. If for some reason Barack Obama, (you CAN write his name you know. The constant "BHO" does nothing except make you look stupider), was found to be unable to be President, then Biden, having qualified, would be sworn in as Acting President while the Congress and Senate decided to leave him as President or select a new President The Supreme Court would not be involved as the 20th Amendment doesn't call for SCOTUS to have a say in the selection. The most likely result in the unlikely event Obama couldn't serve would be Biden as President, with Pelosi or Byrd becoming VP as per the presidential line of succession, as specified by the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (3 U.S.C. § 19) (Clinton, as Secretary of State-designate, might also be considered for the role) There is no senario where both Obama AND Biden would be disqualified, so the hope that somehow McCain / Palin would end up President / Vice President after all are slim, none, and forget it.
However, #5, 6, and 7 are meaningless because, due to birth in Hawaii, Barack Obama IS a Natural-Born US citizen according to the Constitution and US Law. And what IS US Law regarding citizens? To cite US code, Title 8, Chapter 12, Subchapter III, Part 1, § 1401:
The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;
(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;
(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person
(A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or
(B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and
(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States."
There you go. Your nice little pet theory, shot more full of holes than a 99 cent store condom.
As for the second part:
What is more likely is that the house and senate, failing to believe the myths the Birthers are pimping, will certify the electoral votes. Both of Berg's suits will be tossed, any last minute lawsuits will be dismisses, and Barack Obama, a Natural Born citizen under US law and the US Constitution, will be sworn in by Chief Justice Roberts as our 44th President.
So far, the only challenge I see with you trying to figure out what meds you're supposed to be taking and why haven't they been increased?
Posted by: Patrick McKinnion | January 04, 2009 at 10:31 PM
Tracy - Yes, he brings a certain charm to the place. Like a badly trained puppy who piddles on the couch, carpet, chairs, and bed.
Posted by: Patrick McKinnion | January 04, 2009 at 10:33 PM
Martin Lindstedt is quite a piece of work. According to Wikipedia, his jail time was for the following:
"After repeated outbursts at his 2005 pre-trial hearings, he was given a twenty-two month sentence for contempt of court. After he claimed the judge and prosecutor were “agents of ZOG,” the contempt sentence was set aside, and he was sent for mental evaluation, eventually being held in the state hospital in Fulton for a period of approximately three years."
His initial arrest was for allegedly molesting his mentally disabled grandson, BTW.
Posted by: Tracy | January 04, 2009 at 10:39 PM
Another outstanding summary, Patrick. But you forgot one thing.....;)
One must believe that Ed Hale murdered two Bigfoots.
Sorry bud, but I just can't stop laughing about this one.
Posted by: John Dean | January 04, 2009 at 11:22 PM
John Dean - Well, I guess to go with St. Sarah Moosekiller, protector of the North, we can also have Mighty Ed Sasquatchslayer......
Posted by: Patrick McKinnion | January 04, 2009 at 11:33 PM
Thank you for the roundup! I love reading your summaries so I can avoid wading into the dreck myself, although I confess I remain as glued to this whole frenzy as I ever have.
But frankly, it's stopped being funny or entertaining to me. And I promised myself that after Jan 20th, I will NOT look at it any more. I think it was sometime earlier as I read Orly's scheming to get someone in Obama's family to sign documents so they can pry into his grandmother's death. I honestly felt ill. WHAT is wrong with these people? How are they so far removed from reality, or common decency?
I will add that I was very grateful when Orly announced that 6,000 people had visited her site yesterday, and that this was a record. I breathed a sigh of relief--just 6,000 being exposed to this rot!
After the inauguration, I will NOT read this nonsense anymore. I fear it is slowly leaching into my brain. I don't want to end up as crazy and hateful as them.
Posted by: Jennalee | January 05, 2009 at 12:28 AM
Jennalee,
I thought the same after Nov 4. After listening to Ed Hale/Puma during the summer and fall, I was sure I could leave all the insanity behind. I was sure that they could not keep their hate going. I was wrong, the nuts from the repub side joined the insanity of Ed/Puma. While I no longer listen every day to Plains Radio. I do checkout the website every so often. Strangely enough I never could see Ed/Puma making any impact in the election they were just too bizarre. I just can't wait for Jan 21.
Posted by: Kevin Bellas | January 05, 2009 at 12:48 AM
Kudos. The only thing I would add is that Orly's fishing expedition about the scattering of his grandmother's ashes is going nowhere. The EPA leaves it to the states to regulate within three nautical miles, and Hawaii has no problem with cremated remains being scattered from the shoreline or within three miles. In fact, the National Park Service even allows ashes to be scattered at most locations within Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. Of course, this info comes from Janice Okubo, spokesperson for the Hawaii Department of Health -- the same person whose words about the veracity of Obama's COLB have been endlessly parsed by the Birthers to conclude the very opposite of what Okubo stated. Anyway, here is a 2007 article that demonstrates Obama broke no law: ttp://archives.starbulletin.com/2007/02/15/news/kokualine.html
Posted by: GeorgetownJD | January 05, 2009 at 12:55 AM
I have read this post. This is very much true. I run a part time internet marketing business
I have been collecting many material on internet marketing and checking out Jeff Paul's
internet marketing tactics. I hope that we can keep each other's contacts so I can
discuss my problems Even I own a blog account. I will mention your post in my blog.
Posted by: jeff paul internet millions | January 05, 2009 at 01:34 AM
I have spammed this post. This is very much true. I run a pyramid scheme designed to seperate the gullible from their money.
I have been collecting many pictures of penguins in latex bondage and checking out Jenni4Hillary's naked fetish pictures and phone sex tapes.
I hope I can keep contacts of other gullible fools so I can swindle more money from them.
Even I own a Swiss bank account.
I will mention your post to other hucksters.
Posted by: jeff paul eats dog doodoo | January 05, 2009 at 01:57 AM
LOL!
Posted by: John Dean | January 05, 2009 at 02:13 AM
Thanks as always for putting the time in to gather and summarize all this stuff, Patrick. I always look forward to going here first to catch up on how to best monitor the freaks.
And the suit being filed by "Pastor" Martin Luther Lindstedt....ugh! Put me in the "vomit in severe disgust" category on that one!
If that sick fuck actually filed that case on 11/4, is there any record of it being dismissed yet?
Posted by: G | January 05, 2009 at 02:52 AM
Thank you for the list. I'm sure its impossible to list everything as the imagination of Birthers is limitless. One I thought of is you must believe that Senate Resolution 511 states that to be natural born you must both be born in the United States and have both parents be American citizens when it clearly says that birth on US soil alone is dispositive.
I have been following this closely and have debated between concluding that Birthers are dangerous nuts and concluding that they are hapless and therefore harmless nuts. I assume its mostly the latter, though the latest from Orly's site is a blitz to try to get elderly Obama relatives to give up the truth, sign releases, etc. Again, this seems like a quixotic gesture, but it is offensive that they would even think of imposing themselves and their delusions on private citizens, particularly elderly ones.
One anonymous poster on Orly's site dared say that contacting relatives lacked common decency, but I expect the post will be deleted within hours.
Posted by: Brian | January 05, 2009 at 10:18 AM
I'm a stupid moron, with an ugly face, and a big butt, and my butt smells, and I like to kiss my own butt.
Posted by: Ted | January 05, 2009 at 12:23 PM
Seems to be some dissension in the ranks at Citizen Wells about whether Orly is helping or hurting the cause.
Raises an interesting issue for Birthers. Since anyone who disagrees with them is a traitor to their cause, who is the traitor, Orly or those who question what she is up to? Probably makes their brains overheat.
I think there may be a possibility that a true Birther would in the end have to consider him or herself a traitor.
Posted by: Brian | January 05, 2009 at 01:46 PM
Oh man, thank you so much for these write-ups. They're *priceless* and I so prefer to laugh at them here than give their sites traffic. I love the person that's like "QUEEN SARAH PROTECTRESS OF THE NORTH GETS TO BE PREZZY-DENT RITE?????"
My "favorite" thing in the whole crazy Reverend shpiel is how he uses "wiggers" about 5000000 times before he defines it.
Posted by: Marilyn | January 05, 2009 at 01:52 PM
Lindstedt's a real monster, isn't he/it? Perhaps his/its newfound attention by the Secret Service will be appreciated.
There is, however, a great deal of fault in the neocon world for fostering some of this hatred, most significantly within the broader context of immigration rhetoric. This is especially evident with State Sen. Chip Rogers of Georgia, who seems to have made this a signature issue.
Posted by: sunkawakan | January 05, 2009 at 01:59 PM
It seems the paths of the violent hate mongering neo-nazis and the bat-sh#t-crazy birthers are beginning to cross.
I suspect some of the posters over at the Berg Mothership are filtering in from Aryan Nation ("A.N.).
If you check the main A.N. site, they have a post up with questions about Obama that I have also seen posted over at the Berg mothership blog. One can only guess who wrote the original list or how it came to be on the A.N. site. I do think as the inauguration gets closer and the Birthers get more desperate they will be willing to join forces with just about anyone who shares their hatred of Obama.
Given the possibility for these two groups getting together, and the new calls for "armed insurrection" over at the Berg mothership blog, I can only hope that the appropriate authorities are watching these people very closely.
IMHO, this is just not even remotely funny anymore.
Posted by: not a fan of PUMA | January 05, 2009 at 04:49 PM
Totally OT. Please fight PUMA weblog choices and vote for RumpRoast - best small blog:
http://2008.weblogawards.org/polls/best-small-blog/.
You can vote daily - once per computer 'til 1/13.
Thanks!
Posted by: gimmeabreak | January 05, 2009 at 05:53 PM
I see Dr. Orly is now comparing herself to "Ann Colton." That's one thing she is right about.
Posted by: GeorgetownJD | January 05, 2009 at 07:44 PM
John Dean -- It's official! Ed Hale just admitted on-air that he killed the Bigfeet!
Hysterical!
Posted by: StrangeAppar8us | January 05, 2009 at 07:56 PM
Oh, nooooeeeessss! Ed Hale says there was a "traitor" involved in the Port of Entry BC operation. No explanation yet, but it sounds like another Bigfoot story is on its way.
Posted by: StrangeAppar8us | January 05, 2009 at 08:26 PM
GeorgetownJD - does Dr. Orly mean "Ann Coulter"? She's an anorexic transsexual sociopath as well??
Posted by: Patrick McKinnion | January 05, 2009 at 08:29 PM
StrangeAppar8us - "Traitor" meaning "didn't say what I wanted", right?
And did he really! Well, if the Birthers believe Pravda and The Globe, then bigfoot isn't far behind....
Posted by: Patrick McKinnion | January 05, 2009 at 08:30 PM
Patrick-- Yep, he admitted he's "Bugs." But he's dropped the "traitor" story, momentarily anyway. Looks more like he needs another $5,000 PRONTO...
La plus ca change...
Posted by: StrangeAppar8us | January 05, 2009 at 08:35 PM
StrangeAppar8us - Not surprising, Dr. Orly and TexasDarlin are hitting up the party faithful for money as well.
A (blank) and their (blank) are soon (blank) after all.....
Posted by: Patrick McKinnion | January 05, 2009 at 08:48 PM
The Birthers on Ed Hale site are simply pathetic. How can you send money to a Bigfeet murder?
A fool and his money is soon parted.
Posted by: Kevin Bellas | January 05, 2009 at 08:49 PM