Are you really trying to tell me we can't do better??
(crossposted to Bad Fiction)
The Insurance companies are spending $1.4 million dollars a DAY to try and defeat health care reform.
Where are they getting the money? By defining the term "Obscene Profits". In this case, denying people the health care they need. It's obscene to be making profits off the pain and suffering of people needing health care and being forced to jump though hoops to get it.
Think about it. They're spending money they made from denying people medical care, to try and preserve their grossly dysfunctional system.
Critics of health care reform like to use the scare tactics of "socialized medicine" and the bogeyman of long lines for rationed care. What they miss is that even in their scariest claims, it STILL means that everyone has some form of health care. Which is NOT the case right now.
From an economic perspective, health care reform makes a good deal of sense. One of the areas we're not competitive in a global industrial economy is that we're competing against countries that have single payer or other forms of government-managed health care. Whereas in this country the employer has to bear those costs, in a insurance market that rates go up and coverage goes down. And what it also means is people working additional low-paying or abusive jobs simply for the health care coverage.
How much more productive can that company be without having to worry about such things??
How many small businesses can open up if the owners aren't worried about health care coverage for their employees??
How much money is saved for a company when HR doesn't have to juggle plans or cover an increasing amount of costs - or reduce worker benefits?
How much is the economy helped when people can find better and less stressful jobs because they don't have to worry about health care coverage?
From an economic perspective, it makes more sense to keep people healthy by making health care easily available. By reducing the number of sick days and catching illnesses when they're more easily treatable, it increases productivity across the board. It makes more sense to catch things when they're small and more easily treated, than when it's gotten to the point that requires hospital visits and more aggressive treatment. It makes more sense to let people stay in hospital under the doctors care until they're well enough to go home, rather than have some hospital Insurance Reviewer or Coordinator make medical decisions for the patient against the doctors advice.
From an economic perspective, it makes more sense to manage health care costs across the board, reducing administrative costs and allowing doctors and hospitals to focus more on being doctors and hospitals, and less on being cogs in the insurance industry machine.
From an economic perspective, it makes more sense to encourage people to get treated without the fear of having to declare bankruptcy due to medical bills. It makes more sense to encourage people to get treated without the fear that this will be the illness or visit that causes their insurance company to drop them as a risk.
The irony is that we already have rationed medical care in this country, where people have to wait for extended amounts of time and jump though hoops to get the quality and type of health care and treatment they need. Because that's exactly what the insurance industry does to American citizens now - rations out and substitutes lower quality or inappropriate types of care to the patients. Get sick, find out what "insurance covers". The lists of exclusions are endless, the definitions decided by faceless drones in windowless cubicles NOT the health care professionals that have been trained to make these decisions..
Continue reading "Are you really trying to tell me we can't do better??" »



Recent Comments